Answer:
the correct answer is at the beginning of the story
Answer:
Learning history is necessary in order not to repeat the mistakes from the past.
Explanation:
Those who don’t learn history are more likely to repeat it. This attitude makes sense and it’s rarely arguable. People who don’t remember the historical facts can easily repeat them. It’s normal because society is very consistent. No matter how far humanity has come, not so many things changed.
This phrase derives from the end of the 19th and the beginning of the 20th century and the founder of it was George Santayana, a Spanish-born American author, philosopher, essayist, poet, and novelist.
Santayana had a big influence on many philosophical thoughts. His quote that those who cannot remember the past more likely to repeat it is still very well known in the society.
The irony of this quote is that since the 20th century until now there is nothing new. Nothing new can happen without it to be connected to the past, progress depends on retentiveness.
“<em>Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it</em>” means that we have an obligation to save our past in order to keep the present. If we choose selectively what will we remember, it won’t be adequate heritage to future generations.
Not everything can be found on the internet, this technology field is still young. The one who keeps all the information is history.
Answer:
Hello,
Today I visited your restaurant and orderded the signature truffle pasta, wagyu beef steak, and a bottle of 23 year old wine along with your famous color changing ice cream. Since I spent over $300, I was expecting excellent service and a satisfied stomach. But the steak and pasta arrived extremely late and the food was already cold by then. The chees had already soldified and the steak was still a little cold in the inside. I called the waiter named Jean and he looked at me as if I was a dirty peice of gum on his shoe. I wanted him to send the food back to the chef and warm the food up again politly, but he would give me dirty looks and just walked away. I was appalled and disgusted. After 30 minutes later, I got another waiter to send the food back but after it was warmed up, it was even worse. The pasta was overcooked and the sauce was way to salty. The beef had a stench as if it wasn't cleaned well in the beginning. I request that you fire Jean, the rude waiter. I also request you to return the money I paid.
Thanks,
A extremely dissapointed customer
Explanation:
Answer:
Well when dogs join something like the police force they are trained to sniff out bombs, drugs, people and etc. Which is very helpful because they can detect things that we can't necessarily detect all the time. Which makes them a quicker method of detecting things.
Answer:
I would say that yes government should provide health care.
Explanation:
Start off your first paragraph with your opinion and add one reason. An example would be, Government should provide health care because reason 1. Discuss reason 1 in the first paragraph. For the second paragraph start the same way, I think government should provide health care because reason 2. If you have text then include quotes. In one of your paragraphs include a counter claim. Basically say, Some people may say government should not provide health care because (insert reason). Then say, this is not a realistic reason because..... At the end of your first paragraph write a transitional sentence such as, government has many other reasons to provide health care or something along that line. At the end of your second paragraph write a concluding sentence. For example, government should provide health care because reason 1 and reason 2 prove that it would be beneficial. One reason you could use I thought of right away was so that people are able to care more about helping their child, significant other, mom, dad, etc get better than worry about how much money the life saving procedure is going to cost. A reason you could say to not provide health care, is that insurance would most likely fight procedures more and it would be difficult to get treatments because if everyone can now get procedures they need for free, some people may not be accepted because they are not in as dire of circumstances. Overall, a general rule of thumb I use is pick the side that is easiest to support not what you necessarily agree with.
