1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Westkost [7]
2 years ago
5

The Anti-Imperialist League opposed policies such as dollar diplomacy Which statement best explains how dollar diplomacy might b

e interpreted as imperialist ?
History
2 answers:
AveGali [126]2 years ago
6 0

Answer: It allowed the United States to strongly influence foreign governments without treaties or military intervention.

Explanation: Diplomacy is essentially forming international relations, so doing such may be seen as imperialist as a nation may do this to grow their power and influence

taurus [48]2 years ago
6 0

Answer:

It allowed the United States to strongly influence foreign governments without treaties or military intervention.

Explanation:

Took the quiz.

You might be interested in
What led to the fall of Rome
julsineya [31]

First, the Roman Empire became divided between the East, under Constantinople, and the West, ruled by several different leaders. This double-reign was a new concept that weakened the empire. Infighting over leadership and decaying government strength helped set the stage for other groups, such as the Greeks and Byzantines, to become uncooperative. With it's foundations weakened, outside powers were also able to cripple the Romans.

External military threats were a major cause of Rome's fall, and its effects spread across the empire. During its days of prosperity and conquest, many of Rome's enemies were scattered tribes who lived in a small number of villages. After Rome was divided, a powerful group known as the Huns began moving west, their numbers growing with captured prisoners and new allies. People from all walks of life were eager to reap the rewards of war. They continually pressured the Roman Empire, while nations like Russia became powerful and sophisticated. What had been barbarian villages in Germany soon became 2,300 walled towns and cities. Out of these rose the countries of Denmark, Sweden, and Poland. Meanwhile, groups like the Arabs and Saracens of India and Spain sat in anger and contempt. Once its enemies united, the Roman Empire was surrounded with new competition without the proper leadership to address it.

On top of this, the Roman economy was affected by weak currency and high inflation. With all the money going towards national defense, taxes were raised to compensate. Few people actually got to enjoy Rome's prosperity. The value of Roman money plummeted to the point that bartering was preferable to paying for goods. Also, many Romans lost their jobs to cheaper slave labor, resulting in government subsidization of the working class (many workers chose to live off these subsidies, costing the government more money).

A big reason for Rome's collapse was the geographical extent of its military conquest. Rome's constant expansion required more resources and manpower to defend its borders. Additionally, conquered civilizations hated the Romans, so rebellions were constant problems. All these issues required mammoth military spending and recruitment. Manpower became so scarce that even conquered societies were allowed to join the ranks. In turn, this gave barbarians intimate knowledge of Roman battle tactics.

8 0
3 years ago
Which group was NOT a target for racism in the United States during World War II?
Lelechka [254]
The answer is B) the British
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which event did Roosevelt refer to as "a day that will live in infamy"?
marusya05 [52]

Answer:

Pearl Harbor

Explanation:

The President's description of December 7, 1941 as "a date which will live in infamy" was borne out; the date very quickly became shorthand for the Pearl Harbor attack in much the same way that November 22, 1963 and September 11, 2001 became inextricably associated with the assassination of John F.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
When did western expansion start
lbvjy [14]

Answer:

The WESTWARD Expansion started in 1803

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How might patterns of trade and cultural diffusion have differed if Rome, not China, had learned the secret of making silk??
sp2606 [1]

Answer:

Here

Explanation:

The Romans would have controlled the trade meaning the ottomans, and the Persians, would have blocked ways going east, as China did not have an strong army, it was because of Rome they had a route goring to China, and Venice would have never been built, and there would be less Chinese in the world.

7 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Identify the correct invention to the industrial revolution with its inventor. Choose all that are correct.
    13·1 answer
  • How was the conflict between Pope Gregory VII and Henry IV resolved?
    10·1 answer
  • Which of the following was the most significant contribution made by John Adams in the us constitution
    5·2 answers
  • Someone who is running a political office is known as______.
    14·2 answers
  • Who was in control of the economy
    13·1 answer
  • What is the preamble of the constitution
    13·1 answer
  • Native American cultures shared which of the following characteristics with the Incas?
    9·1 answer
  • Which country was one of the Central Powers during World War I?
    8·1 answer
  • So do people actually use brainly for school now? Weird how things have changed.
    13·2 answers
  • Explain why is it important that the federal government and the state governments have separate as well as shared powers.
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!