Answer:
Letter A is correct. <u>Routine response behavior.</u>
Explanation:
Routine response behavior is a buying decision making process characterized by the act of a consumer purchasing a product or service that he has previously purchased, ie, it is configured as a usual buying scenario, the consumer already has experience buying certain products. and the purchase decision occurs automatically and routinely.
Generally this buying behavior occurs with non-durable consumer goods, which are those used consistently by the consumer, such as food, medicines and cleaning products.
Answer:
If RUS > RUK, then E < F ( C )
Explanation:
RUS = annual risk free rate in united states
RUK = annual risk free rate in United kingdom
F = futures price of $/BP for 1 year
E = spot exchange rate for $/BP
To get a higher the future price
this conditions must be met
The annual risk free rate of the united states must be higher than the annual risk free rate of the united kingdom. if this condition is met then the the British pound will have a forward premium ( F ) > ( E )
<u>Answer:</u>
<em>Sold product liability suit against the maker, alleging a design defect, the court may consider an available alternative design
</em>
<em></em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
At the core of the idea of faulty item configuration exemplified in the Restatement (Third) of Torts: Product Liability is the accessibility of a sensible elective plan that could have diminished or kept away from the danger of mischief. In any case, a product might be defective, regardless of whether no sensible elective plan exists, if it neglects to give possible directions or warnings of a predictable danger of damage. An ongoing choice of the Massachusetts Appeals Court represents the use of these standards.
Answer:
tdvggggggggggggggggggyyyyy
Answer:
The development should be not be considered as it not a relevant cash outflow
The $254,000 sale price for existing line is a relevant cash inflow
Cash flows:
Year 0 -$$1,536,000
Years 1-13 $746,000
Explanation:
The development cost has already been incurred,it is not a relevant cash outflow since the cash flows to be considered are those would be incurred in the future in respect of the new line of club heads.
The sale price of the existing line is a relevant inflow as it would only be received as a result of switching to the new line of club heads.
The relevant cash flow from year 1 to 13 is computed thus:
year 0 cash outflow would be the cost of new equipment less the sale price of existing line i.e -$1,790,000+$254,000=-$1,536,000
In years 1 to 13 ,there would cash inflow of $746,000 in each year
