Answer:
Option B- He acted in good faith.
Explanation:
The person who is trading with the other party owes the duty of care which is well stated in the negligence act. However in this case we saw that though the law was unclear but still the CEO acted in best interest of the public at large by consulting the attorney to shed light on the issue. Remember law is ethically minimum that is desired but in this situation the CEO was committed to comply with law that's why he consulted attorney. So saying that he acted in good faith is the best defense in the court.
Answer:
how to present to the public the results of your product or events in your company
Answer:
If you can prevent a nonpaying consumer from having access to a good or service, that good is excludable. For example, only clients that buy a ticket can enter a movie theater and watch the movie.
A good or service that can be consumed by only one consumer (or a specific number of consumers) is rival in consumption because other people cannot consume them simultaneously. For example, once the movie theater sold out, no more people can get inside and watch the movie.
Answer:
$63
Explanation:
Calculation for what should the futures price be
Using this formula
Future price=Current spot price (1 + r)
Let plug in the formula
Future price= $60*(1+0.05)
Future price= $60* (1.05)
Future price= $63
Therefore what should the futures price be is $63