A. Specifications
Make sure to follow @get.sendy on Instagram.
Tony Hawk follows :)
Answer:
The Supreme Court ruled in favour of the Complainants, enforcing the contract.
Explanation:
The Lucy Vs Zehmer case was one of decision on if a contract was binding or not on the basis of the undisclosed intentions of the parties involved in the contract. Zehmer alleged that he had jokingly sold and transferred title to Lucy while drunk. However the court ruled that contract for the sale of land to Lucy was valid on the basis that the secret intentions of Zehmer was not known or disclosed in the sale of the land and only his actions count for the contract to be binding.
Answer:
The intent of the parties is to be bound by the contract.
<h3>What is the UCC battle of the forms rule?</h3>
- Typically these so-called battles of the forms occur when a buyer and seller of goods exchange pre-printed order forms with their own different terms on the back and then proceed with the transaction without ever signing any final contract or reaching an agreement on the terms of the deal.
To learn more about it, refer
to brainly.com/question/24553900
#SPJ4
Answer:
JT, SM, VD
Explanation:
Calculation to rank the products in the order in which they should be emphasized
VD JT SM
Selling price per unit
$ 344.85 $ 415.40 $ 119.32
Less:Variable cost per unit
$ 270.18 $ 310.88 $ 91.96
Contribution per unit
$74.67 $104.52 $27.36
÷Minutes on the constraint 5.70 6.70 1.90
=Contribution per minut
$13.10 $15.60 $14.40
Ranking
VD $13.10 Third
JT $15.60 First
SM $14.40 Second
JT, SM, VD
Therefore the product will be rank from the highest to the lowest which is JT, SM, VD
