Answer:
The Germans were surprised by the location of the invasion by America but had an effective counter-attack.
I don't see answer choices so this is what I have for you! :)
Answer:
Patriots argued that citizens must give up freedoms to ensure security, but Loyalists disagreed.
Explanation:
I just did this and it was right but from my understanding patriots didn't want nobody to have freedom instead give up their freedom for security but the loyalists wanted everybody to have freedom and everybody to live how they want.
<em>President Andrew Jackson</em> opposed giving the bank a new charter because he saw the Second National Bank<u> </u><u>as an elitist institution</u> whose first priority <em>was to gain profit and not public service.</em>
The voting public reaction to Jackson's vetoing the renewal of the Second National Bank Charter <em>was positive even though he lost a lot of voters from the wealthy class he gained votes from the working class like farmers and laborers</em>. <em>He won the re-election in November 1832</em> although it was a tight contest.
Asoka unified the empire by conquering unexplored tribal and forested regions. <span>He had a violent conquest over Kalinga (which was a state separate from his empire) and reunited all of these separate states until he was ruling a vast majority of what is now the Indian Subcontinent (India, Pakistan and Bangladesh). Hope that helps.</span>
Titles of people involved – State cases are brought by prosecutors or district attorneys; federal cases are brought by United States Attorneys. State court trial judges have a range of titles, but federal judges are called district court judges.
Federal magistrate judges are used in federal cases to hear initial matters (such as pre-trial motions), but they do not usually decide cases.
The use of grand juries to charge defendants is not required by all states, but it is a requirement in federal felony cases unless the defendant waives the grand jury indictment.
States and the federal government have laws making certain acts illegal, and each jurisdiction is responsible for setting punishments for committing those crimes. A state may punish a certain crime more harshly than the federal government (or vice versa), but a defendant can be charged and convicted under both systems.
