1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
vova2212 [387]
3 years ago
10

Andrew Jackson Aaggressively exercising his presidential power.

History
2 answers:
Murrr4er [49]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

True. As a former US Lawyer, Senator and the 7th President of the United States of America, Andrew JAckson championed this idea of the president being in charge of the national policy issues rather than leaving it in the hand of the Congress.

Explanation:

He is known as the peoples president due to the series of policies he initiated like the support of individual liberty, the policy that caused the forced migration of the native Americans etc.

His use of the veto power is also another way which he demonstrated the idea that the president rather than congress should take the lead in national policy issues. A typical example is the bill on the bill through Congress to re-charter the second bank of America (institution) which he vetoed (the rejection of the bill) because it encourages the advancement of the few individual at the expense of other citizens. :) can i get brainiest!

lubasha [3.4K]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

Andrew Jackson vetoed so many bills he was called King Andrew to mock him. This is how he used his presidential power aggressively.

Hope this helps plz hit the crown :D

You might be interested in
Which of the following was a
Mrrafil [7]

Answer:

B. Iraq War, Conflict between Iraq and Iran

4 0
2 years ago
The nation of Italy was a part of
zubka84 [21]

Answer: A, Triple Alliance

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Details.<br> 1.<br> Discuss the criticisms of the name Tuskegee Syphilis Study.
KATRIN_1 [288]
The Tuskegee Study of Untreated Syphilis in the African American Male is the longest nontherapeutic experiment on human beings in medical history, as noted by Arthur L. Caplan (1992). Begun in 1932 by the United States Public Health Service (USPHS), the study was purportedly designed to determine the natural course of untreated latent syphilis in some 400 African American men in Tuskegee, Macon County, Alabama. The research subjects, all of whom had syphilis when they were enrolled in the study-contrary to the “urban myth” that holds “black men in Alabama were injected with the virus that causes syphilis” (Walker, 1992)-were matched against 200 uninfected subjects who served as a control group.

The subjects were recruited with misleading promises of “special free treatment,” which were actually spinal taps done without anesthesia to study the neurological effects of syphilis, and they were enrolled without their informed consent.

The subjects received heavy metals therapy, standard treatment in 1932, but were denied antibiotic therapy when it became clear in the 1940s that penicillin was a safe and effective treatment for the disease. When penicillin became widely available by the early 1950s as the preferred treatment for syphilis, this therapy was again withheld. On several occasions, the USPHS actually sought to prevent treatment.

The first published report of the study appeared in 1936, with subsequent papers issued every four to six years until the early 1970s. In l969, a committee at the federally operated Center for Disease Control decided the study should continue. Only in 1972, when accounts of the study first appeared in the national press, did the Department of Health, Education and Welfare (HEW) halt the experiment.

At that time, 74 of the test subjects were still alive; at least 28, but perhaps more than 100, had died directly from advanced syphilis. An investigatory panel appointed by HEW in August 1972 found the study “ethically unjustified” and argued that penicillin should have been provided to the men. As a result, the National Research Act, passed in 1974, mandated that all federally funded proposed research with human subjects be approved by an institutional review board (IRB). By 1992, final payments of approximately $40,000 were made to survivors under an agreement settling the class action lawsuit brought on behalf of the Tuskegee Study subjects. President Clinton publicly apologized on behalf of the federal government to the handful of study survivors in April 1997.

Several major ethical issues involving human research subjects need to be studied further. The first major ethical issue to be considered is informed consent, which refers to telling potential research participants about all aspects of the research that might reasonably influence their decision to participate. A major unresolved concern is exactly how far researchers’ obligations extend to research subjects. Another concern has to do with the possibility that a person might feel pressured to agree or might not understand precisely what he or she is agreeing to. The investigators took advantage of a deprived socioeconomic situation in which the participants had experienced low levels of care. The contacts were with doctors and nurses who were seen as authority figures.
4 0
2 years ago
What is widely believed to be the one accomplishment of the Articles of Confederation?
Irina18 [472]

Answer:

Your answer is C) The Northwest Ordinance was passed in 1787 which set guidelines for forming new states.

Explanation:

Hope this helped : )

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Under Europe's system of feudalism, a large amount of land with many vassals was called
anastassius [24]

B. a fiefdom.

A fiefdom was land granted to vassals and knights.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • All of the statements below are historically accurate. Mark the item if the event it describes helped lead to war between Britai
    5·1 answer
  • Who won the french and indian war ?
    9·1 answer
  • Who was the chief architect of economic policy in the United States during the 1920s?
    11·1 answer
  • James I of England angered many of his subjects by
    7·1 answer
  • Plz will mark brailyist
    13·1 answer
  • ANSWER THE QUESTIONS BELOW FOR BRAINLIEST AND 30 POINTS
    5·1 answer
  • How did minnesota contribute to the civil war?
    13·1 answer
  • How did the European Union’s new common market change life for workers?
    14·2 answers
  • Which statement would a anti-federal be most likely to agree with
    9·1 answer
  • American Revolution: Causes 2<br> Drag the item from the item bank to its corresponding match.
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!