I think it's B, to prevent unfair or deceptive business practices. I'm might be wrong though, so you may wanna just check with someone else. Hope this helps
Answer:
A <u>increase</u> in the money supply will cause interest rates to decrease, which, in turn, causes spending to <u>increase.</u>
Visible artifacts; and underlying values. If you don't find an answer on this site, use Google.
Answer:
8% and 4.8%
Explanation:
In this question, we use the Rate formula which is shown in the spreadsheet.
The NPER represents the time period.
Given that,
Present value = $1,294.54
Future value or Face value = $1,000
PMT = 1,000 × 11% = $110
NPER = 20 years
The formula is shown below:
= Rate(NPER;PMT;-PV;FV;type)
The present value come in negative
So, after solving this,
1. The pretax cost of debt is 8%
2. And, the after tax cost of debt would be
= Pretax cost of debt × ( 1 - tax rate)
= 8% × ( 1 - 0.40)
= 4.8%
Answer:
<em>Yes, this is antitrust violation. Because, the tend to restrain trade in that small city thereby denying other small player brokerage firms from making a living due to their monopolistic actions among themselves.</em>
Explanation:
Antitrust laws are designed in-order to prohibit a number of business practices that restrain trade. Examples of illegal practices are price-fixing conspiracies, corporate mergers that are likely to cut back the competitive fervor of certain markets, and predatory acts designed to gain or hold on to monopoly power.
<em>Violations of such laws attract sanctions and punishment from the regulatory body in-charge of protecting such.</em>
