Answer:
I think is c) Reached California and returned east by land
Im sorry if Im wrong
Explanation:
Answer:
A. "If they can get away with it, so can I"
Explanation:
Social-psychological research has revealed that exposure to televised violence might weaken viewers' inhibitions about using violence in their own lives. In other words, this means that by watching violence on TV, people will more likely think that violence is an option they can use in their day-to-day life.
Therefore, if Peter is one person that might be inhibited when watching violence on TV, he will likely think "if they can get away with it, so can I" when he watches a violent cops-and-robbers show since he will think that violence is an option in his day-to-day life.
Answer:
businesses operating with little government regulation
Explanation:
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
It seems that ypur question is incomplete because it doesn't include any context, reference, map, or something we can use to help you answer the question.
What tribes are you referring to? What is the time in history?
However, trying to help you, we can comment on the following.
We assume that you are referring to the European presence in Africa after the Berlin Conference of 1855. If that is the case, then we can say that what happened to tribes when the Europeans made these new borders was that they eliminate some borders, modified others, create new regions, moved tribes from their former territories, and displaced people.
This was a moment in history known as the Scramble for Africa," that started in 1885 and ended approximately in 1914.
The European countries involved in the partition of Africa were France, Great Britain, Portugal, Germany, Italy, Spain, and Belgium. In reality, these countries were only interested in colonizing Africa to exploit the many raw materials and natural resources of the continent.
Answer:
Same here................
