Answer:
The excerpt informs the reader that there were likely inaccuracies in the report provided to the court.
Explanation:
The above statement most appropriately relates that how the author's purpose of the given frame and the excerpt are distinct. It reveals that 'the excerpt aims to inform the readers about the imprecision involved in the report that was presented to the court' as the report says 'Faryad had pellets in his left arm' which is logically false if he was sitting on the bicycle with Iqbal who had in the right side and hence, the frame asserts a different story. That's how both are different from each other.
I think he made a desicion that people can only learn from nature not harsh life
- The most true statement is that <u>D) </u><u>Shia Muslims</u><u> appear to be the </u><u>minority group</u><u> within </u><u>Islam</u><u>.</u>
- The best explanation for the split between Sunni and Shia is that it was over<u> D) A </u><u>disagreement </u><u>over the</u><u> leadership</u><u> of the</u><u> Islamic world</u><u> </u><u>after </u><u>the </u><u>death </u><u>of the </u><u>prophet Muhammad.</u>
The map is not included but it is accurate that the Shia are a minority in Islam because:
- Sunnis comprise 87% - 90% of all Muslims
- Shia comprise 10% - 13% of all Muslims
The Shia are therefore heavily outnumbered by the Sunni who have used their dominant position to occasionally marginalize the Shia.
The reason the Shia and the Sunni split was because they could not agree on who would lead the Muslims after the Prophet Muhammed died. Sunni wanted a man named Abu Bakr to lead and the Shia wanted Ali ibn Abi Ṭalib.
In conclusion, Islam has two main denominations which are the Sunni and the Shia but the Sunni outnumber of Shia who had split from the Sunni because they could not accept their choice for Muhammed's successor.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/1483771.</em>
Whats the homework? I might be able to help.