Answer:
idfk but ill pass you onto the next person
Explanation:
i just need points ig im in a test
Answer:
The history of Georgia could have been different if it were always considered an ideal home for its diverse population. That's because if the population was high Georgia will grow exponentially.
Explanation:
One difference between primary and secondary succession is that; the secondary succession begins on soil while primary succession begins on newly exposed surfaces.
<h3>
Further Explanation:
</h3>
Ecological succession
- It is a gradual process by which ecosystems undergo changes and develop over a period of time.
- The changes in an ecosystem occurs as a result of interaction between organisms and the environment through processes such as growth and reproduction.
<h3>Types of Ecological succession;
</h3><h3>Primary succession
</h3>
- This is a type of succession that takes place in lifeless areas as a result of disturbances such as glaciers, lava flow from volcanoes, sand dunes, etc.
- These regions are not capable of sustaining life of organisms as a result of the disturbances caused by those factors.
<h3>Secondary succession
</h3>
- Secondary succession is an ecological succession that results from disturbances such as forest fires, abandoned field or after occurrence of floods.
<h3>Differences between secondary and primary succession </h3>
- The difference between the two types of ecological succession is the fact that; primary succession starts with bare rocks while secondary succession starts with existing soil and dirt.
- Additionally, it takes about a thousand years for primary succession to develop while secondary succession takes about a 100 or more years to develop.
Keywords: Ecological succession, primary succession, secondary succession
<h3>Learn more about:
</h3>
Level: High school
Subject: Biology
Topic: Ecological succession
Sub-topic: Types of succession
More people, regardless of economic status, would be able to provide opinions on important issues.
US voting is optional, each voter decides whether or not to vote. An argument for making compulsory voting may be based on the explanation that if everyone voted, more people from different walks of life and with distinct perspectives would be called upon to contribute on the political scene with their opinions and vote.