Here are some example of Nuclear Energy:
Nuclear Fusion
Nuclear Fission
Nuclear Weapons
Nuclear Medicine
Answer:Disaffirmance
Explanation:
Disaffirmance , It defines a fact that a voidable contract is void. This means a person who had signed a voidable contract has the right to not abide by it.
A person may verbally state that they won't abide by the contract or they will just choose to not do what the contract says without actual stating that they won't abide by it.
A voidable contract is the one in which two parties formally agree on something but this contract is not enforceable for several legal reasons.
Reasons that can make a contract voidable :
-Misrepresentation or fraud by one of the parties
-If someone is threatened to enter through a contract
- When one party is legally incapacity to be part of the contract such as Jacquie who entered a contract before he reached an age of majority.
Age of majority is an age when someone is considered an adult by the law.
Answer:
vu u u k jo p kool I y cm
h9v
Explanation:
chbibbojibib Hussein's guvvuvuvuv
Yep that’s right although it’s a little hard to read
Answer:
No, he is not guilty of criminal fraud because of
Explanation:
Roger is the CFO of a corporation and had a business dinner with some of the company's largest shareholders. Roger knowingly and intentionally started drinking a variety of alcoholic drinks and even excused himself to secretly snort cocaine in the men's room. By the end of the evening, he obviously intoxicated. His dinner companions kept buying more rounds of drinks, and Roger needed no urging to continue drinking. By dessert, he was obviously extremely intoxicated. At that point, his companions asked him to sign a variety of documents, which he did not read due to his condition. The documents turned out to be falsified financial statements, which were then supplied to the accountants who were auditing the company. Is Roger guilty of criminal fraud?
No,he is not guilty of criminal fraud because he was intoxicated, he likely could not have formed the required mens rea and would not be guilty of criminal fraud
.If voluntarily intoxicated to the point that criminal intent cannot be realized or formed, a defendant would not be guilty
