Yes, the crime still would have been committed. Falsification of documents and false representations are crimes, irrespective of their consequences.
However. If Mills had paid, Pivowar would never have come to know about the false representation and the case would not have come to court. Whether the case comes to the court or it does not, is an independent factor of whether a crime has been committed.
A crime is an offense punishable by state or other authority. The term crime does not have a simple, generally accepted definition in modern criminal law, but a statutory definition is provided for specific purposes.
Learn more about crime here:brainly.com/question/6203610
#SPJ4
Answer:
The Townsend act we’re a series of laws passed by the British government...
Answer:
naturalistic observation; survey
Explanation:
Naturalistic observation: In psychology, the term naturalistic observation is defined as a research method that is being used by social scientists and psychologists. The psychologists who are conducting the naturalistic observation generally observe the participants in their natural environment.
Survey: In psychology, the term survey is defined as one of the research methods that involve collecting data from the participants being studies by asking various questions in person, phone, paper, or online.
In the question above, Chan-ju's study is an example of naturalistic observation and Lucas's study is an example of a survey.
<span>Radical terrorists who use fear tactics to intimidate those with whom they disagree ideologically are examples of Revolutionary movement.
A revolutionary movement is a radical movement that aimed to completely eliminate the current society where they lived in and changed it into a new society that fit the revolutionists' narratives</span>