Answer:
pretty sure that health scientists, assuming they understand pharmaceutical actions and reactions, get paid either way & possibly get cheaper h insurance for their expertise.
Explanation:
No, does not affect their work because they get paid to test new drugs on lab rats, chimps, dogs, etc. to see if there is an effect on subjects they give a medical condition to. As unfair as it seems, once lab subjects are tested for years, and they witness if they're theories are justified or not; then they determine a trial run on human test subjects. this process can take up 2 10 years or longer.
<span>Cellulose is a lot stronger than starch. Starch is practically
useless
as a material, but celluose is strong enough to make fibers from, and
hence rope, clothing, etc. Cellulose doesn't dissolve in water the way
starch will, and doesn't break down as easily.
</span>Your body contains
enzymes that break starch down into glucose to fuel your body. But
we humans don't have enzymes that can break down cellulose.
I think it might have been the elephant, which is letter b
Hypothesis- introduced evolution before Darwin, two big theories; use or disuse and acquired characteristics
