1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
romanna [79]
3 years ago
6

According to Jody freeman what are some of the reasons why Fed’s should intervene with national standards

Social Studies
1 answer:
stealth61 [152]3 years ago
6 0

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

Although there are no options attached, we can say the following.

According to Jody Freeman, some of the reasons why the federal government should intervene with national standards to regulate fracking, are the following.

She, as the expert on environmental issues she is, says that the federal government is better equipped to regulate the use of fracking in the United States. The main argument is that fracking is a controversial practice to extract oil and gas because it damages the environment. The states are not in a position to better manage this issue, alone. She considers that the risks of fracking can go beyond state limits and could become a national interest.

Jody Freeman is a renowned professor of Harvard School of Law that specializes in environmental law.

You might be interested in
In legislative terms, a bill is a proposal_____. A. made in the House of Representatives. B. that has reached committee for deba
Mekhanik [1.2K]
In legislative terms, a bill is a proposal or any law. The bill can be proposed in either the <span>House of Representatives or the Senate. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the fourth option or option "D". I hope that this is the answer that has basically come to your great help.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
how do you pronounce the name of the indian that helped Lewis and Clark vbecause ive heard so many different ways to say it???
natima [27]
Sock-uh-juh-wee-uh you can also look up a pronunciation
5 0
3 years ago
Why are all aspect ratios identified as something to 1?
Irina-Kira [14]
Because 1 divided by 1 is still 1
7 0
3 years ago
Roman empire State building and the Roman empire
morpeh [17]
What's the question ?
5 0
3 years ago
A construção do conhecimento pode ser dividida em dois grandes eixos, isto é, o conhecimento produzido a partir do chamado senso
worty [1.4K]

Answer:

Sources from which I proceeded to develop this way of thinking, They are both

historical and biographical sources and can be summarily described by the headings:

(1) Language, (2) the work of the skeptics from the beginnings of Western History,

(3) a key concept of Darwin’s theory of evolution and, (4) Cybernetics.

About thirty years ago, Heinz von Foerster noticed an inherent quality of the

nervous system (and almost everybody believes that human beings must be viewed as

nervous systems when one focuses on cognition): The signals that are sent from

sensory elements to the cortex are all the same. This had been discovered by Johannes

Müller around the middle of the last century, but von Foerster was, as far as I know,

the first to emphasize its epistemological implications.

He called this “undifferentiated coding”.1 What this means is that if a neuron in

the retina sends a “visual” signal to the cortex, this signal has exactly the same form as

the signals that come from the ears, from the nose, from fingers or toes, or any other

signal-generating part of the organism. There is no qualitative distinction between any

of these signals. They all vary in frequency and amplitude, but there is no qualitative

indication of what they are supposed to mean.

It was a very baffling observation. It has since been confirmed by Humberto

Maturana in the field of color vision, where he has shown that the receptors which are

supposed to sense red – or what physicists think of as the kind of light waves we call

red – send signals that are in no way different from the ones that sense green. If we

are able to distinguish them, the distinctions must be made in the cortex. Yet, they

cannot be made on the basis of simple qualitative differences, because there are no

such differences.2 It is therefore unwarranted to maintain that we distinguish things

because we receive “information” from what we usually call the outside world.

From the epistemological point of view, this is earth-shaking. Yet if you look

through the contemporary literature of psychology and especially the psychology of

perception, one finds practically no reference to it.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • While reading a friend's status update on a social networking site, Cory ignores the scrolling newsfeed and the changing adverti
    10·1 answer
  • Which mineral resource is Cuba a major producer of? Question 4 options: A.) oil B.)gold C.)silver D.)nickel
    11·2 answers
  • According to ervin goffman, when jim willfully tries to manipulate others, he is engaging in _________ .
    8·1 answer
  • Why was the location of New Orleans an important factor that led to the Louisiana purchase
    13·1 answer
  • How can Conrad use dish soap with his model to study how adding dispersants to oil spills would help protect water birds from th
    10·1 answer
  • Which sociological perspective makes the most sense to you as a means to study society? Why?
    9·2 answers
  • What are governments bonds? Why are banks willing to buy government bonds from the federal reserve?
    8·2 answers
  • DO IT ALL PLEASE FOR 50 pointsplease and thank you:):)
    10·1 answer
  • This is the name given to the most senior member of the majority party in a parliamentary system.
    7·1 answer
  • What is an example of checks and balances?
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!