The correct answer is A. 1.5 cups
Explanation:
The total of polishing wooden furniture is equivalent to the total of olive oil plus the total of lemon juice. Additionally, in this case, the result should be given in cups. First, let's consider the values given.
50% of a cup of lemon juice + 25% of a quart with olive oil
The first quantity 50% of a cup of lemon indicates half cup of lemon was added, which is equivalent to 0.5 cups as 1 cup = 100% of a cup and 50% is the half.
Now, the second quantity is provided in quarts, which is not the same as a cup. Indeed 1 quart is equivalent to 4 cups, which represents 100%. This means 100% = 4 cups. Now, to calculate the 25% follow this procedure.
1. Write the values
4 = 100 (total percentage)
x = 25 (percentage to be calculated
2. Solve this by using cross multiplication
x100 = 4 × 25
x100 = 100
x = 100 ÷ 100
x = 1 (cups in 25%)
This means 1 cup of olive oil was added and this plus 0.5 cup of lemon juice is equivalent to 1.5 cups of solution.
Answer:
16 times out of 64
Step-by-step explanation:
So, I could be wrong, but basically:
9, 10, and 11 are only 3 of the 12 possible outcomes that could happen.
3 out of 12 is 1/4.
What this means is that for every 4 times he spins the pointer, he can expect to get 9, 10, or 10 once.
Or 25% of the time
1/4 of 64 is 16.
The answer is: "
105 mi. " .
____________________________________________Explanation:____________________________________________Note that: "that amount of time" is "3 hours".
→ 
= ? ;
→ The units of "h" (for "hour/s") cancel out to "1" ; since ("h/h = 1") ;
→ and we are left with (35 * 3) mi.
= 105 mi. ____________________________________________ The answer is: "
105 mi. " .
____________________________________________
Answer:
210
Step-by-step explanation:
it's geometric and you're multiplying by 3 each time
Null hypothesis: There is no significant association between the existing process and the new process for reducing the population proportion of screens that will be rejected
.
Alternative hypothesis :There is a significant association between the existing process and the new process for reducing the population proportion of screens that will be rejected
.
Finally the null hypothesis will be rejected and we should accept the alternate hypothesis
Step-by-step explanation:
In the existing process the sample size and population was not known.,but the percentage of rejected screens were given as 12%.,but in the new process out of 100 screens only 6 are rejected
percentage of rejected screens using new process = 6÷ 100 ×100 = 6%
percentage of rejected screens using existing (old) process = 12%
so the new process is the effective one which reduces the rejection rate of screens., hence it is concluded that There is a significant association between the existing process and the new process for reducing the population proportion of screens that will be rejected
.
so the null hypothesis will be rejected and we should accept the alternate hypothesis
