1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Karo-lina-s [1.5K]
2 years ago
10

How the Executive Branch Checks the Legislative Branch

History
1 answer:
alexdok [17]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

The Executive Branch has veto power in Congress. This means that they can cancel out a law. However, Congress can override that veto with a 2/3 vote, almost impossible bc of the parties and everything. It can also pass executive orders, which bypass congress and create a law for a temporary time. Lastly, they have the ability to send in military for I think 48 hours until they need Congress to approve it.

Explanation:

Hope This helps! Also can I get brainliest?:)

You might be interested in
What is the most accurate conclusion someone can draw from this grapLook at the bar graph. What is the most accurate conclusion
AURORKA [14]

The most accurate conclusion to make about the "Voter Turnout by Gender and Age, 2008 Presidential Election" bar graph, is that older women vote in higher percentages than younger men. It can also be added that women of any age in general vote in higher percentages than men of any age, which shows that women are more concerned and interested in the Presidential Elections than men are. This may be due to the different politics discussed during this elections that could have had great impact in women.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Best answer gets marked brainliest Classical Greece and Rome have contributed greatly to our current understanding of democracy.
Nuetrik [128]

Answer:Democracy was having an important role in history, because the Greeks had an important role (political), which led them to developed democracy. Also, Romans had an important role by adding a representative government. As you know people lived under the rule of kings and other rulers who held the power.Mar 23, 2015

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
If I fail this text I fail my class :(<br><br> There are 3 question left please help me
Lelu [443]

Answer and Explanation:

<u>The answer is All of the Above.</u>

--

In early 1915, Germany introduced a policy of unrestricted submarine warfare in the Atlantic. This meant U-Boats were hunting and sinking merchant shipping without warning. The RMS Lusitania left New York on 1st May, 1915, bound for Liverpool. On 7th May it was spotted off the coast of Ireland by U-20 and torpedoed. Of 1,962 passengers, 1,198 lost their lives. Among the dead were 128 Americans, causing widespread outrage in the US.

--

In January 1917, the German diplomatic representative in Mexico received a secret telegram penned by German Foreign Secretary Arthur Zimmermann. It proposed a secret alliance between Germany and Mexico, should the United States enter the war. If the Central Powers were to win, Mexico would be free to annex territory in New Mexico, Texas and Arizona. Unfortunately for Germany, the telegram was intercepted by the British and decrypted by Room 40. The British passed the document to Washington and it appeared on the front page of American newspapers on 1st March.

This combination of factors turned public opinion around. On 6 April, the United States declared war on Germany and began to mobilize. The first American troops arrived in Europe in June.

--

Germany resumed unrestricted submarine warfare in 1917. Knowing they risked provoking the United States into joining the war, Germany gambled on defeating the British before the US had a chance to mobilize. During February and March, several US cargo vessels were sunk without warning, resulting in the United States severing diplomatic ties with Berlin.

<em><u>#teamtrees #PAW (Plant And Water)</u></em>

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why do people support the Right to Bear Arms amendment?
EleoNora [17]

Answer:

Explanation:Modern debates about the Second Amendment have focused on whether it protects a private right of individuals to keep and bear arms, or a right that can be exercised only through militia organizations like the National Guard. This question, however, was not even raised until long after the Bill of Rights was adopted.

Many in the Founding generation believed that governments are prone to use soldiers to oppress the people. English history suggested that this risk could be controlled by permitting the government to raise armies (consisting of full-time paid troops) only when needed to fight foreign adversaries. For other purposes, such as responding to sudden invasions or other emergencies, the government could rely on a militia that consisted of ordinary civilians who supplied their own weapons and received some part-time, unpaid military training.

The onset of war does not always allow time to raise and train an army, and the Revolutionary War showed that militia forces could not be relied on for national defense. The Constitutional Convention therefore decided that the federal government should have almost unfettered authority to establish peacetime standing armies and to regulate the militia.

This massive shift of power from the states to the federal government generated one of the chief objections to the proposed Constitution. Anti-Federalists argued that the proposed Constitution would take from the states their principal means of defense against federal usurpation. The Federalists responded that fears of federal oppression were overblown, in part because the American people were armed and would be almost impossible to subdue through military force.

Implicit in the debate between Federalists and Anti-Federalists were two shared assumptions. First, that the proposed new Constitution gave the federal government almost total legal authority over the army and militia. Second, that the federal government should not have any authority at all to disarm the citizenry. They disagreed only about whether an armed populace could adequately deter federal oppression.

The Second Amendment conceded nothing to the Anti-Federalists’ desire to sharply curtail the military power of the federal government, which would have required substantial changes in the original Constitution. Yet the Amendment was easily accepted because of widespread agreement that the federal government should not have the power to infringe the right of the people to keep and bear arms, any more than it should have the power to abridge the freedom of speech or prohibit the free exercise of religion.

Much has changed since 1791. The traditional militia fell into desuetude, and state-based militia organizations were eventually incorporated into the federal military structure. The nation’s military establishment has become enormously more powerful than eighteenth century armies. We still hear political rhetoric about federal tyranny, but most Americans do not fear the nation’s armed forces and virtually no one thinks that an armed populace could defeat those forces in battle. Furthermore, eighteenth century civilians routinely kept at home the very same weapons they would need if called to serve in the militia, while modern soldiers are equipped with weapons that differ significantly from those generally thought appropriate for civilian uses. Civilians no longer expect to use their household weapons for militia duty, although they still keep and bear arms to defend against common criminals (as well as for hunting and other forms of recreation).

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The Neutrality Acts of the 1930s were intended to achieve what outcome?
dimaraw [331]
To avoid policies that would draw the U.S into international conflict.
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What were some good things about living under muslim rule in the 8th and 9th<br> centuries ?
    8·1 answer
  • Auppose ou have the job of assigning the proper number of house of representatives seats of various states to do that you must k
    8·1 answer
  • Who led the fight for independence in Argentina? (please help asap)
    13·1 answer
  • The following text is part of the opinion of the United States Supreme Court in the Miranda vs. Arizona case of 1966:
    13·1 answer
  • What was the purpose of the Manhattan Project? Group of answer choices To make America the financial capital of the postwar worl
    8·1 answer
  • How did the cold war influence the foreign and domestic policy?
    9·1 answer
  • 4 points
    14·2 answers
  • What role should the government playing in pulling its citizens out of economic hardships?
    15·1 answer
  • Hello How does this document represent the progressive notion of voter empowerment?
    6·1 answer
  • The Preamble to the U.S. Constitution lists six goals, including which of the following?
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!