Answer:
a. natural law for Josh, and legal positivism for Colin.
Explanation:
Natural law is a concept that seeks to ground law in common sense, rationality, equity and pragmatism. It does not propose a description of human affairs through a formalized theory or law; Nor does it seek to reach the level of descriptive social science. Natural law has, as its project, to evaluate human options in order to act reasonably and well in the conception of the individual. Josh is using the concept of natural law when he believes, based on his own common sense conceptions, that it is correct for him to decide how fast he will have to ride his own car.
On the other hand, legal positivism refers to a set of norms formulated and enforced by human beings. These norms represent an order that must be followed even if it seems unfair and incorrect. This can be seen in Colin's argument that Josh must slow down the car because it is exceeding the speed allowed by law.
Answer: its because we will need people to replace them and we need everyones opinions
Explanation:
Answer:
It can reduce brain injuries.
Explanation:
This rule of wearing helmet is a good initiative taken by the commissioner of the national football league. these helmets reduce the risk of concussions because these helmets are made of good materials and able to protect the head of the players from brain injury. So avoid such type of injuries, the helmet should be used by the player which can absorb all the energy and protect the head of the player.
Answer:
<h3>Freedom of speech.</h3>
Explanation:
- Freedom of speech is a principal that advocates the freedom of a person to state his/her opinion freely and to impart information and ideas without any restrictions.
- However, in the case of Schenk v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that the Constitution does not protect a person when "falsely shouting fire in a theater and causing panic" because freedom of speech does not protect speech that has the potential to incite danger and disharmony in the society.
- Therefore, in the case of Schenk v. United States, freedom of speech of First Amendment was limited.
Answer:
d. Both A and B
Explanation:
Even if Tameka passes her exam, she cannot apply for her 4-year salesperson's license because of option <em>d. Both A and B</em>. Anyone who wants to obtain a 4-year salesperson's license has to be at least 18 years old. As Tameka is a 16-year old she cannot apply for the license. Moreover, in the State of California, the applicants are required to take real estate classes, 135 hours. As she lives in Canada she will not be able to apply.
