Answer:
Near v. Minnesota
Explanation:
In the case of Near v. Minnesota, the Supreme Court held that, except in the most extraordinary circumstances, the First Amendment prohibits the government from seeking to prevent news outlets from publishing whatever they want.
Near v. Minnesota (1931) is a landmark United States Supreme Court decision which declare every State powerless to restrain by injunction the business of publishing and circulating news, it is the first major ruling concerning freedom of the press that the Court ever decided.
Physiological, safety, love/social, self-esteem, self-actualization
Answer:
a. differential reinforcement of incompatible behaviors
Explanation:
Differential reinforcement of incompatible behaviors is an approach that involves replacing a problem behavior with a positive behavior by reinforcing and stimulating a positive behavior that cannot be exhibited the same time with the problem behavior. Differential reinforcement of incompatible behaviors works well especially in cases of people having autism spectrum disorder (ASD) where the individual engages in problem behaviors that inflict injury on the individual.
From the question above, the therapist uses the differential reinforcement of incompatible behaviors approach, as he uses praise as a reinforcement to increase the frequency at which Zander chews gum or sticks out his tongue, as these behaviors cannot occur together with the behavior of biting of lips. Chewing of gum, sticking out of tongues are reinforced in order to replace the biting of lips with them.
The correct answer is Bottom-up processing
Bottom-up processing is a process based on the stimulus reaching the sense organ.
No they would not have went to africa
