1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Varvara68 [4.7K]
3 years ago
6

I’ll mark brainlist

History
1 answer:
MariettaO [177]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

i think B sorry if wrong

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Drag each label to the correct location on the chart.
Tamiku [17]
Answer:

hunter-gatherers - their diet was mainly meat from wild animals , they did not own many things.

farmers - they owned land and property , they depended on domesticated plants and animals for food.

explanation: farmers are people who own their own land and grow their own food. they eat plants that they grown and eat pigs and other animals that they raise. hunter-gatherers are basically hunters. they have weapons and they go out and kill their food in the woods or in a field. they eat what they catch meaning they rely on their their skills to eat.
4 0
4 years ago
How did the Jackson era change politics in America?
In-s [12.5K]
The Jackson Era set the Executive Branch on an equal footing with Congress in terms of power and ability to shape law and government policies
6 0
4 years ago
Daniel Webster was an outspoken advocate of which group?
likoan [24]
Daniel Webster was in the group of the nationalists. He was affected with the national republican party from 1828 to 1833.
6 0
3 years ago
Which best explains why protecting public health is an important duty of state government
aleksley [76]

Protecting public health is an important duty of state government because the government wants to make sure that everyone is healthy. This is why the government contributes to cancer research.

Build off of that

4 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1. Opponents of Miranda argue that procedural safeguards imposed on police as a result of the ruling undermine criminal investig
katrin [286]

The Miranda warning is a statement that police is requires to give to criminal suspects in police custody. This warning advises them of their right to remain silent and their right to refuse to answer questions.

Opponents of this practice argue that by having this process in place, police investigations can sometimes be undermined. I, however, believe that this should not outweigh the protection of individual rights. If the police is properly trained, there is no reason why they would not be able to find the information they need despite the warning, and despite the person's right to remain silent. Moreover, it is important to protect this right for the accused person as well, as it makes it more likely for him or her to have a fair trial.

8 0
4 years ago
Other questions:
  • What was the nuclear family
    6·2 answers
  • What was one result of the election of Andrew Jackson in 1828?
    11·1 answer
  • This is the name for 18th century trade between West Africa, the West Indies, North America, and Europe.
    5·2 answers
  • Who were the plebeians? how much power did they have?
    15·1 answer
  • How did the Third Crusade’s peace treaty affect people in the Holy Land?
    14·1 answer
  • The war powers act (1973) was an attempt by congress to
    8·1 answer
  • What happened in hundreds of cities immediately after the assassination of martin luther king, jr.?
    13·1 answer
  • Mainland China is controlled by the Communists whereas Taiwan is controlled by
    5·2 answers
  • Help ,this homework is almost due i need this fast
    10·1 answer
  • What are two components of laissez-faire economics?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!