Answer:
A (I only) The rescue of the foundations of popular sovereignty
Explanation:
The liberal ideals that marked new republics focused on the rights people have in republics, which governments should protect in the best way they could. This is clearly shown in the U.S. Declaration of Independence and the French Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen. In some way these ideals come from the Enlightenment that questioned the Divine right of monarchs and claimed that the government´s purpose is to protect and to serve the people (=popular sovereignty), as in A.
II <em>The separation of the powers of the state </em>is a doctrine of (specific) American law that separates the executive, legislative and judicial power.
III <em>A marked society of privileges </em>is what the liberal ideals were trying to get rid of.
I’m not sure but i think it is A
Maybe try Kelly Pneumatic Iron Process?
They either worked in factories or worked on farms
Answer:
The ability of ecotourism to protect both people and places is an unresolved, and growing, concern. Commodification of host culture and environment is a widely reported social impact of tourism and spawns an array of implications regarding indigenous people's view of their places and themselves. The degree of impact from ecotourism development is related to the degree of market development within the indigenous community and their state of decline regarding natural resource scarcity. Pre-existing power differentials between local people and other groups may be exacerbated by ecotourism development. To protect both people and their places, native people's claim to control should be legitimized by conservation and government authorities, particularly indigenous people's role in technical management of the protected area. Regional and national government controls are relevant at the inception of ecotourism development, but ultimately should be reduced to one of infrastructure planning and coordination.
Explanation:
