To answer the similar part, All of them were being discriminated against.
- The correct answer is D. Substantive due process. The reason is simple, by passing the law, Congress has facilitated the compliance of federal authorities with the principle of procedural due process (the principle that if the government is going to deprive a person of life, liberty and/or property they have to follow the proper procedures as per the laws and the Constitution). Normally, the Fourth Amendment protects citizens from unreasonable search and seizure. However by passing this law Congress has bypassed such protections by stating that searching the home of anyone suspected of terrorism without a warrant is valid under the new law. However, the principle of Substantive Due process is clear: the fact that procedural due process was respected under the new laws does not prevent such law from being unconstitutional as it violates the Fourth amendment.
Answer:
I believe it would be A or D
Explanation:
<span>During the 1500's the Roman Inquisition created a list of criticisms of the Roman Catholic Church, in which Pope Paul III examined and proscribed false doctrines and errors within the church.</span>
D.
Because the author can show how characters change (A), but they need to show how the characters acted before the change (C). And B is just what explains the character.
