<span>Freedom of speech is a bellweather: how any society tolerates those with minority, disfavored, or even obnoxious views will often speak to its performance on human rights more generally. In international law, access to information and free expression are two sides of the same coin, and both have found tremendous accelerators in the Internet and other forms of digital communication. At the same time, efforts to control speech and information are also accelerating, by both governments and private actors in the form of censorship, restrictions on access, and violent acts directed against those whose views or queries are seen as somehow dangerous or wrong. From our earliest days, when we were called The Fund for Free Expression, we have fought all forms of repression of speech, in all media, around the globe.</span>
I believe the answer is: parliamentary Democracy
In a parliamentary Democracy type of government, the executive branch of the government could give an order toward the legislative branch of the government to pass a certain law.
This is different compared to our current democracy, where there is a separation of power between the executive and legislative branhces of the government, and they exist to limit each other's power.
Answer:
d
Explanation:hope i helped :D
Thomas Paine was a Patriot, meaning he fought for Independence from England. So your answer would be D, Thomas Paine wrote Common Sense in order to encourage colonists to separate from England.
Hope this helps :)
Vicksburg's loss was in many ways more important to the war. Now, Union forces had complete control of the Mississippi River and had in effect cut the Confederacy in two. Confederate forces in Arkansas, Louisiana, and Texas were now isolated from the rest of the South.
