B, D, E, and F are your answers!
The Supreme Court decision in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966) required (for the first time) that someone accused of a crime be informed of his or her constitutional rights prior to interrogation. This protected the rights of the accused, or the defendant, in two new ways: 1) It educated the person about relevant constitutional rights; and 2) It inhibited law enforcement officials from infringing those rights by applying the Exclusionary Rule to any testimony/incriminating statements the defendant made unless he intentionally waived his rights.
I think it's U.S.<span> International </span>Trade <span>Administration or World </span><span>Trade Organization. Not sure.</span>
Answer:
Self-fulfilling prophecy
Explanation:
Self-fulfilling prophecy: The term self-fulfilling prophecy was given by Merton and is defined as a "socio-psychological phenomenon" in which an individual expects or predicts about something and later on this expectation or prediction comes out to be true just because he or she believes it to happen and the outcome leads to fulfilling those beliefs.
Types:
1. Other-imposed prophecy.
2. Self-imposed prophecy.
In the question above, the statement signifies the self-fulfilling prophecy.
