Answer:
Thanks, you are so generous
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
The answer is .393. Hope this helps.
Answer:
The earnings will double
Step-by-step explanation:
Step one:
given data
we are told that the sales person's earnings is 4% of the sales made.
given that the sales made is $37,000 worth of furnaces.
Step two:
we want to find 4% of $37,000
=4/100*37000
=0.04*37000
=1480
hence for $37,000 the earning will be $1480.
Now suppose sales is doubled that is 37000*2= 74000
we want to find 4% of $74,000
=4/100*74000
=0.04*74000
=2960.
the earnings is $2960.
So if sales doubles the earnings will double
Answer:
7,10,13,16,19,21,24,27
Step-by-step explanation:
Add 3 every time
I hope this helped you! If it did, please consider rating, pressing thanks, and giving my answer 'Brainliest.' Have a great day! :)
One of the major advantage of the two-condition experiment has to do with interpreting the results of the study. Correct scientific methodology does not often allow an investigator to use previously acquired population data when conducting an experiment. For example, in the illustrative problem involving early speaking in children, we used a population mean value of 13.0 months. How do we really know the mean is 13.0 months? Suppose the figures were collected 3 to 5 years before performing the experiment. How do we know that infants haven’t changed over those years? And what about the conditions under which the population data were collected? Were they the same as in the experiment? Isn’t it possible that the people collecting the population data were not as motivated as the experimenter and, hence, were not as careful in collecting the data? Just how were the data collected? By being on hand at the moment that the child spoke the first word? Quite unlikely. The data probably were collected by asking parents when their children first spoke. How accurate, then, is the population mean?
