Answer:
There is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.
Step-by-step explanation:
We are given the following in the question:
Sample size, n = 1432
p = 23% = 0.23
Alpha, α = 0.05
Number of theft complaints , x = 321
First, we design the null and the alternate hypothesis
This is a one-tailed test.
Formula:
Putting the values, we get,
Now, we calculate the p-value from the table.
P-value = 0.298
Since the p-value is greater than the significance level, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and accept the null hypothesis.
Conclusion:
Thus, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that Alaska had a lower proportion of identity theft than 23%.
Complete question :
A pair of $36 jeans were on sale at Jim's Jeans for 1/3 off. The same pair of jeans were $42 at David's Denims. The jeans were on sale for 2/3 off.
A.) which store had the better buy
B.) how much will you pay at the store that has the better buy
Answer:
A.)David's denim has the better buy
B.) $14
Step-by-step explanation:
Jim's Jean store :
Cost of Jean = $36
Discount = 1/3 off
Discounted cost = $36 - (1/3 * $36)
Discounted cost = $36 - $12 = $24
David's Denim:
Cost of Jean = $42
Discount = 2/3 off
Discounted cost = $42 - (2/3 * $42)
Discounted cost = $42 - $28 = $14
David's denim has the better buy with a discounted price lower than the discounted price at Jim's store.
Cost at store with the better buy is $14
Answer:
24 pounds of Rift Valley coffee
26 pounds of Mexican Shade Grown coffee
Step-by-step explanation:
If R is pounds of Rift Valley coffee, and M is pounds of Mexican Shade Grown coffee, then:
R + M = 50
12.10 R + 13.10 M = 12.62 (50)
Substitute:
12.10 R + 13.10 (50 − R) = 12.62 (50)
12.10 R + 655 − 13.10 R = 631
R = 24
M = 26
Answer:
The answer is 75
Step-by-step explanation:
By way of parallelism
