Answer:
Former Chief Justice of the United States
Served from 1801 to 1835
Answer:
The power of the purse is the ability of one group to manipulate and control the actions of another group by withholding funding, or putting stipulations on the use of funds. The power of the purse can be used positively (e.g. awarding extra funding to programs that reach certain benchmarks) or negatively (e.g. removing funding for a department or program, effectively eliminating it). The power of the purse is most often utilized by forces within a government that do not have direct executive power, but have control over budgets and taxation.
<em>WAS</em><em> </em><em>THIS</em><em> </em><em>ANSWER</em><em> </em><em>HELPFUL</em><em>?</em><em> </em>
MARK ME AS A BRAINLEIST
<span>❅ </span>It existed f<span> from the </span>end of the Napoleonic Wars to the outbreak of World War I.
It was very difficult to change membership in an estate.
Answer: Option D.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The french revolution was the time of huge social and political upheaval, instabilities and problems in France along with the colonies of France. It started from the beginning of 1789 and ended with the end of 1799.
During the time of french revolution it was very tough for the people of France to change their membership in an estate causing an increase in the problems that the people were suffering from.
Answer:
Thanks!
Explanation:
oday, it may seem impossible to imagine the U.S. government without its two leading political parties, Democrats and Republicans. But in 1787, when delegates to the Constitutional Convention gathered in Philadelphia to hash out the foundations of their new government, they entirely omitted political parties from the new nation’s founding document.
This was no accident. The framers of the new Constitution desperately wanted to avoid the divisions that had ripped England apart in the bloody civil wars of the 17th century. Many of them saw parties—or “factions,” as they called them—as corrupt relics of the monarchical British system that they wanted to discard in favor of a truly democratic government.
“It was not that they didn’t think of parties,” says Willard Sterne Randall, professor emeritus of history at Champlain College and biographer of six of the Founding Fathers. “Just the idea of a party brought back bitter memories to some of them.”
