<u>Answer:
</u>
Both the U.S. and the Russian Constitutions grant the right of free speech, but the Russian Constitution restricts the use of informal, abusive, and derogatory language to this freedom.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- The Constitutions of both the countries, namely the United States and Russia are similar on the grounds of certain rights granted by both, but most rights granted by the United States Constitution are unrestricted as long as they do not threaten the national interest of the country.
- The Constitution of Russia applies certain restrictions on the use of rights citing that as a need to keep the integrity of the nation unharmed.
Answer:
Conditions immediately preceding development
On the other end of the pre-development definition is the assumption that land disturbance has previously occurred with the land use in place at project initiation
Answer:
The acanthion.
Explanation:
The acanthion is a point lying near the base of the nose; specifically, the point at the base of the anterior nasal spine that lies on the mesial line; tip of the anterior nasal spine.
Answer with Explanation:
Overt and Covert research methods are both used in <em>observing subjects.</em> The main difference relies on the "awareness" of the <em>subjects/participants</em> being studied.
In an overt research method, the subjects are <u>aware</u> that they are participating in the study while in a covert research method, the subjects are <u>unaware.</u>
The advantages of overt research method is that the participants have <em>informed consent.</em> So, whatever happens is not the fault of the researcher. Since the participants are aware, it becomes easier for the researcher to record events in their presence. On the contrary, it brings about some disadvantages. Since the participants know that they are being observed, they may be<em> inclined to change their behavior.</em> This is called the "Hawthorne Effect." This affects the validity of the outcome of the research.
The advantages of the covert research method is its <u>more valid outcome of research.</u> The participants are <em>naturally behaving,</em> which means that it is more valid as a method than the overt. It is also easier to access closed groups because they are unaware you are observing them. However, one disadvantage is the "deception" it needs to tackle as it <em>doesn't ask informed consen</em>t from its subjects. This has always raised ethical concern, especially for people who value their privacy.
So, this explains the answer.
