Answer:
<em>differential susceptibility</em>
Explanation:
<em>Differential susceptibility:</em> It was proposed by <em>Jay Belsky,</em> and is defined as the phenomenon that describes people differs or vary in various degree and depends on the fact that how much they are affected by qualities or experiences of a particular environment they are being exposed to. A few people are considered as more susceptible as compared to the other person, and it can be both negative as well as positive.
<em>In reference to the question, the findings illustrate the concept of differential susceptibility.</em>
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
I am going to take into consideration the 1st. Amendment to the United States Constitution.
It is true that the federal government must often balance protecting individual liberties and providing for order and security. We have seen how, at times, priority is given to one over the other, depending on the circumstances.
However, according to my thinking and belief systems, the federal government should always place more emphasis on protecting individual liberties. Just when the exceptional case is necessary, then the federal government must provide for order and security.
As stated in the 1st. Amendment, citizens must always have their freedom of speech and freely express what they believe is right; this includes reasonable critics of the economic and political systems, as well as to highlight positive attributes too.
Respecting the differences has always been a trademark for true democracies.
It is understandable that in times of conflict, as was the case of WWI and WWII, the government has put restrictions on certain liberties.
Some would say that the September 11 attacks justify the creation of the type of surveillance the government placed on the citizens, but that is when a fine line was crossed between protection and "espionage" without the consent of the citizens.
True
As they are further apart then in real Life
1. Registration is difficult
2. Two parties may not be enough
3.People without a college degree are less likely to seek out political information.
