Sorry, i wish i could help, but really the only thing i know is that 4 is 2 by 2 so using another equation to try to prove otherwise is irrational in itself
Answer:
See explaination
Step-by-step explanation:
See attachment for diagram
The r value is 0.373 (low). This implies a weak correlation between the dependent and independent variables for this sample.
The overall p- value for the regression model is 0.0017. This implies that at least one of the two independent variables (x1 or x2) in the model is significant predictor of the dependent variable y.
p- values for the both "Fact" and "Star" are < 0.05. This means both the independent variables are significant predictors of the "Rating" at 95% confidence level. The variable "Fact" is significant at 99% level of confidence also. This means the rating viewers award to a movie depends upon both the storyline (fact or Fiction) and the presence or absence of stars.
Expected rating for a fact based movie with no stars = 1.7991(1) + 1.2586(0) + 12.5685 = 14.37
Expected rating for a fiction based movie with a star = 1.7991(0) + 1.2586(1) + 12.5685 = 13.83
So, one may expect a fact based movie without any stars to get better ratings than a fiction based movie with one star.
I think multiplication but I’m not sure sorry
Question:- Alana biked 12 miles in 48 minutes. What is Alana's speed in miles per minute?
Answer:-
Set up a proportion.
12/48 = 1/x
Cross multiply.
12*x = 12x
48*1 = 48
12x = 48
12x/12 = 48/12
x= 48/12
x= 4
Now, we have our final answer. x = 4
Final answer:- Alana bikes 4 miles per minute.