Answer:
I do not agree because Mario's claim is not general.
Step-by-step explanation:
Prime numbers: These are a set of numbers that are divisible by 1 and itself only. Examples are: 2, 3, 5, 7. 11 etc.
And a denominator is the divisor in a given fraction.
Considering the following fractions whose denominators are prime numbers:
= 0.66666666...
= 0.142857142
= 0.45454545...
= 0.23076923
= 0.142857142
It could be observed that Mario's claim is not a general principle which is applicable to all fractions with a prime denominator. Thus, I do not agree with his claim.
F(x) = C , hope this helped !
If 5 = 6 , than 4 =7
so, line L // m
Let 1st integer = xLet 2nd integer = x + 1 We set up an equation. x(x + 1) = 195 x2 + x = 195 x2 + x - 195 = 0
We will use the quadratic formula: x = (-b ± √(b2 - 4ac) / (2a) x = (-1 ± √(1 - 4(-195))) / 2 x = (-1 ± √(781)) / 2 x = (-1 ± 27.95) / 2 x = 13.48x = -14.78
<span>We determine which value of x when substituted gives us a product of 195.</span> 13.48(14.48) = 195.19-14.48(-13.48) = 195.19 <span>The solution is 2 sets of two consecutive number</span> <span>Set 1</span> The 1st consecutive integer is 13.48The 2nd consecutive integer is 14.48
<span>Set 2</span> The 1st consecutive integer is -14.48The 2nd consecutive integer is -13.48Hopefully this helped, hard work lol :)
Answer:
f(-6) = -14
Step-by-step explanation:

Hope this helps you.