Answer:
The business judgement rule states that if the board takes decision in good faith and in best interest of the corporation considering the information available then its decision is not to be questioned by the courts. The courts can intervene only if there is any breach of good faith, due care or loyalty.
The above case is similar in facts with another case paramount vs time. In that case Time decided to merge with another company named Warner. Paramount also started bidding for Time but the directors of Time rejected their bid offer citing that warner merger would be more suitable for the company strategy.
Paramount then brought the case against Time in court.The court stated that the instant case was different from another case (REVLON VS MacAndrews) where Revlon was up for sale and hence it was necessary for the board to sell its assets to the highest bidder.
Not guarantee that resources will be allocated efficiently nor that there will be equality.
Answer:
Explanation:
The journal entry is shown below:
Amortization expense - Patent A/c Dr $32,380
To Patent A/c $32,380
(Being amortization expense for the first year is recorded)
The computation is shown below"
= Purchase cost of patent ÷ estimated useful life
= $161,900 ÷ 5 years
= $32,380
For the intangible assets, the amortization expense is considered,not the depreciation expense and the same is to be taken.
Answer:
C) limited; unlimited
Explanation:
Economics can be described as the study of how people use limited resources to satisfy unlimited wants.
