I would say these two examples show a type of performance evaluation ie analyzing what was successful and why or alternatively what was not successful and why so as to learn from the experience to continue to perform well in the future or to change poor performance to good performance.
The correct concerning the payback rule is rule is flawed because it ignores all cash flows after some arbitrary point in time.
Payback period in capital budgeting refers to the time required to recover funds spent on an investment or to reach breakeven. Example: If at the beginning of year 1 he invests $1,000 and at the end of year 1 and his second year he earns $500, it pays for itself within 2 years.
The number of years it will take to recover the money invested. For example, if it takes 5 years to recover the cost of an investment, the payback period is he 5 years.
Payback period is defined as the number of years required to recover the original cash investment. In other words, the period during which a machine, plant, or other investment has generated sufficient net income to cover its investment costs.
Learn more about Payback period brainly.com/question/23149718
#SPJ4
Get a job, get money & bam you got money
c.
Arrogantly
Explanation:
What Candice is saying here basically boils down to 'we don't need to compare this to last year's performance as I want to see positive results not negatives'<u> insinuating that the performance has become worse in the last year.</u>
<u>Regressions in a financial report mean weaker performance over the fiscal year while projections mean that the performance was better.</u>
