Currently, I would say LEAN and Six Sigma.
The correct answer is choice b - the percentage of receivables basis.
When an accountant is calculating the bad debts expense they will take into account the balance in the Allowance for Doubtful Account when they are calculating on the percentage of sales basis.
Answer:
patent 301,350 debit
cash 301,350 credit
franchise 633,600 debit
cash 633,600 credit
development expense 189,000 debit
cash 189,000 credit
year-end adjustment:
amortization expense 50,225 debit
patent 50,225 credit
amortization expense 31,680 debit
patent 31,680 credit
Explanation:
The patent and franchise will be activate as there is a certain possibility to produce positive cashflow in the future.
They will be adjusted at year-end for amortization:
301,350 / 6 = 50,225 amortization on patent
633,600 / 10 = 63,360 amortization on franchise
As it was concede on July 1st then, we will do half-year
63,360 / 2 = 31,680
The development cost will be treated as expense as there is no precise information that can determined the development cost which yield a positive outcome.
Answer: You need a GED or High School Diploma
Explanation: In addition to being a United States citizen or permanent resident alien, you must have a high school diploma or GED to join the Army as an enlisted member. You must also meet height, weight and overall physical health standards. The minimum score you can get on the ASVAB test is a 31.
Answer:
First of all, an auditor must be skeptical about the information that he/she is gathering and analyzing. They should try to get as much audit evidence as they can in order to form an opinion. But an auditor can also reasonably assure that there are no material misstatements, either intentional or not intentional.
Most auditor procedures are intended to discover unintentional misstatements, but intentional misstatements are very hard to discover because more than one individual (or even a very large group) might have colluded in order to conceal them. The auditor gets his information from the controller, internal auditor, and other people within the organization, but what if they all colluded in order to conceal their bad actions.
E.g. an auditor should check for shipping receipts to be complete, accurate and in order, but he/she relies on information given by the same people that he/she is evaluating. The auditor can conclude that the shipping reports are complete, but he/she cannot state that they are true and valid because he/she wasn't there.
