Answer:
Framing.
Explanation:
The case of framing a death penalty convict is a frequent dilemma that surrounds most cases among capital punishment criminals. Due to the increased media coverage, there can arise many more sides of the story, leading to more speculation of whether the person is guilty or not.
The media coverage leads to a massive support system for the convicts and presents an increase in the awareness of the case and the possibility of convicting the wrong man. The chance that an innocent man may be executed by a wrongful accusation has led to massive public awareness ad influence the public's opinion, thereby leading to increased speculation of wrongly executing an innocent man. This then leads to <u>an innocent man being "framed" or made to appear guilty for the government had already made a mistake and it is easier to frame him rather than admit their mistake in public. </u>
Killing a lot of people and causing the 9/11 attacks
<span>In this example, squirming and giggling is a(n) "conditioned response".
</span>
A conditioned response is a conduct that does not fall into place, but rather should be learned by the person by matching an impartial boost with an intense stimuli. The potent stimulus is one that does not require any learning or molding to react to properly. Natural stimuli don't at first have any reaction related with them, and the right reaction must be learned through rehashed pairings with an potent stimuli.
b
Explanation:
i think that b is the answer
