Answer:
The first one is imperialism, the second one is introduce the benefits of European civilization to other peoples.
Explanation:
In the first question, it's explaining how they should take land, that's an imperialist move. In the second one, they're telling you to do things to benefit the white man.
El significado de la vida es "estar libre de sufrimiento"
Machiavelli describes three ways to hold states that have
been accustomed to living freely under their own laws. The first
is to devastate them. The second is for the conqueror to occupy
them. The third is to allow the state to maintain its own laws,
but to charge taxes and establish an oligarchy to keep the state
friendly. The third option is advantageous because the newly imposed
oligarchy will work hard to secure the authority of the conquering
prince within the conquered state because it owes its existence
to the prince and cannot survive without his support. Thus, as long
as the goal is not to devastate the other state, it is easiest to
rule it through the use of its own citizens.
Hope this helps, took me awhile to type it all. :)
The correct answer is - Different parts of the region were the most influenced by cultures that had easiest access to them.
Most of Eastern Europe is relatively flat lowland, and it also borders Asia, as well as being part of the great Eurasian steppes. Because of this, in Eastern Europe it was very common that new people with new cultures from Asia were coming, invading, integrating, and that had left a huge mark on the development and culture of the people living in this part of the continent. Starting with the Scythians, Sarmatians, Avars, Huns, Tatars, Khazars, Kumans, Mongols, Bulgars, Magyars, Szekeli, all came from Asia, and all had big influence on the region in whichever aspect do we look at it.
Answer:
***TEN POINTS***
Explanation:
These were created to keep black men from voting by Bourbon Democrats.
hope it is helpful to you
