The three eventual consequences are the following:
First – it is the end of feudalism, which was both the social and economic system of the Middle Ages.
Second – it is the beginning of centralized government in England, and
Third - it also started the development of a democracy there.
        
                    
             
        
        
        
Answer:
I would use a combo of mustard gas grenades to get the enemy out (mustard gas is VERY lethal), mortars to destroy any bunkers or ammo storage, and gorilla tactics and snipers to take out the enemy.
Explanation:
I do a lot of WW1 and WW2 planning of how I would do battles-
 
        
             
        
        
        
The correct answer is B) Native Americans could not trade effectively because they lacked economic leaders. 
<em>The disadvantage that native Americans experienced in their trading with Europeans was that  Native Americans could not trade effectively because they lacked economic leaders. </em>
European people had many years of experience trading with some other nations. For instance, with Asian and African territories when they expanded their dominions in those regions. So they had experience in negotiating good trades. That was not the case of Native American tribes that had a completely different system of trade with other Native American tribes. There were not experienced leaders in trading with European people and that represented a disadvantaged in negotiations. 
 
        
             
        
        
        
I would say more so that they viewed the Arab lands as territories that they would guide and influence to be part of their imperial system.  
Imperialism differs from colonialism.  In a colonial system, the home country transplants many of its own society members to the colony to control it and to provide resources back to the home country.  In an imperial system, the imperial country seeks to build a network of influence and commercial enterprises so that it can grow its wealth and advantage through its expanding empire.
Let's look at the British Mandate in Palestine as an example.  The British did seek to work with local Arab and Jewish populations to set up operational governments there.  But a British bias toward the Jewish population in the region was evident -- as that population mainly were emigrants from Europe and the European administrators of the Mandate understood their culture better.  The Jews who settled in Palestine also were motivated to build up the land for agriculture and commerce, which was enriching the region beyond the ways that had been present under the previous Arab way of life.  Britain was also interested in the region for its strategic location for trade and influence throughout the Middle East and beyond.