1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Elodia [21]
3 years ago
7

1. Which of the following is not an argument in support of imperialism? *

History
1 answer:
Elza [17]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The United States should spread its ideals to other parts of the world.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
How did religion affect the potitical and social of the middle ages
eduard
The Catholic Church dominated the continent of Europe so virtually everyone was Catholic and because of this The Catholic Church was extremely powerful and influential in society.
6 0
3 years ago
PLZ HURRYYYY!!!!!i will give brainliest
kakasveta [241]

Answer:

A. Spain

Explanation:

Just took the test.

Hope this helps

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which side fired the shot heard around the world?
Allisa [31]
<span>B) The English fired first.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did Andrew Jackson treat the second national bank? Why?
Andreyy89

Answer:

President Andrew Jackson announces that the government will no longer use the Second Bank of the United States, the country’s national bank, on September 10, 1833. He then used his executive power to remove all federal funds from the bank, in the final salvo of what is referred to as the “Bank War."

A national bank had first been created by George Washington and Alexander Hamilton in 1791 to serve as a central repository for federal funds. The Second Bank of the United States was founded in 1816; five years after this first bank’s charter had expired. Traditionally, the bank had been run by a board of directors with ties to industry and manufacturing, and therefore was biased toward the urban and industrial northern states. Jackson, the epitome of the frontiersman, resented the bank’s lack of funding for expansion into the unsettled Western territories. Jackson also objected to the bank’s unusual political and economic power and to the lack of congressional oversight over its business dealings.

Jackson, known as obstinate and brutish but a man of the common people, called for an investigation into the bank’s policies and political agenda as soon as he settled in to the White House in March 1829. To Jackson, the bank symbolized how a privileged class of businessmen oppressed the will of the common people of America. He made clear that he planned to challenge the constitutionality of the bank, much to the horror of its supporters. In response, the director of the bank, Nicholas Biddle, flexed his own political power, turning to members of Congress, including the powerful Kentucky Senator Henry Clay and leading businessmen sympathetic to the bank, to fight Jackson.

Later that year, Jackson presented his case against the bank in a speech to Congress; to his chagrin, its members generally agreed that the bank was indeed constitutional. Still, controversy over the bank lingered for the next three years. In 1832, the divisiveness led to a split in Jackson’s cabinet and, that same year, the obstinate president vetoed an attempt by Congress to draw up a new charter for the bank. All of this took place during Jackson’s bid for re-election; the bank’s future was the focal point of a bitter political campaign between the Democratic incumbent Jackson and his opponent Henry Clay. Jackson’s promises to empower the “common man” of America appealed to the voters and paved the way for his victory. He felt he had received a mandate from the public to close the bank once and for all, despite Congress’ objections. Biddle vowed to continue to fight the president, saying that “just because he has scalped Indians and imprisoned Judges [does not mean] he is to have his way with the bank.”

On September 10, 1833, Jackson removed all federal funds from the Second Bank of the U.S., redistributing them to various state banks, which were popularly known as “pet banks.” In addition, he announced that deposits to the bank would not be accepted after October 1. Finally, Jackson had succeeded in destroying the bank; its charter officially expired in 1836.

Jackson did not emerge unscathed from the scandal. In 1834, Congress censured Jackson for what they viewed as his abuse of presidential power during the Bank War.

3 0
2 years ago
Which statement accurately describes lines of longitude on a map
bonufazy [111]
Exact location is the answer
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • If you buy the toaster pastries at a discount store, you
    5·1 answer
  • What are three facts or specific examples of the gender and racial gap in the U.S. labor market?
    15·1 answer
  • Who argued in the 1881 book a century of dishonor that the indians had been treated unfairly? merrill gates thomas goodwood hele
    6·1 answer
  • The exchange of goods and services between the Native Americans and the Europeans was called the ______________________________.
    10·2 answers
  • It was at first impossible for anyone to realize what had actually happened. The smoke and fumes hid everything from sight, and
    10·1 answer
  • In paragraph form (100-150 words), explain how the Roman Empire benefited from its geographic location. Plz I need this answer r
    11·2 answers
  • During the triangular trade, countries in
    14·1 answer
  • Elections and voting why should they matter?
    9·1 answer
  • Calculate the molar masses of the compounds listed below
    10·1 answer
  • Why did the Roman Empire hold together for so much longer than Alexander?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!