1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Rus_ich [418]
3 years ago
12

What was one result that Simon Bolivar had on South America ?

History
2 answers:
sasho [114]3 years ago
5 0
Bolívar's decisive victory at Carabobo led to the independence of Venezuela and establishment of the Republic of Gran Colombia.
mash [69]3 years ago
3 0

One result that Simon Bolivar had on South America was that "In 1819, Bolívar was able to successfully create a nation called Colombia."

You might be interested in
Risk and __________ increase or decrease together. A. return B. deposit C. liquidity D. accessibility
raketka [301]

Answer:

D because it makes sense

5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the space below, write a 500-word comparative essay evaluating the key similarities and differences between the world’s major
vodomira [7]

Form of government, political form, regime of government, political regime, system of government, political system, system of government, model of government or political model are some of the diverse ways of naming an essential concept of political science and the theory of State or constitutional right. It refers to the model of organization of constitutional power adopted by a State in terms of the relationship between the different powers. The way in which political power is structured to exercise its authority in the State, coordinating all the institutions that form it, makes each form of government requires regulatory mechanisms that are characteristic of it.

There are very different nomenclatures to denominate the different forms of government, from the theorists of Antiquity to the Contemporary Age; At present, three types of classifications are usually used:

• The elective character or not of the head of state defines a classification, between republics (elective) and monarchies (non-elective).

• The degree of freedom, pluralism and political participation defines another classification, between democratic, authoritarian and totalitarian systems, depending on whether they allow the exercise of discrepancy and political opposition to a greater or lesser degree or deny more or less radically the possibility of dissidence (establishing a single-party regime, or different types of exceptional regimes, such as dictatorships or military juntas); At the same time, the electoral system through which the popular will expresses itself in participatory systems has had very different historical configurations (direct democracy or assembly, indirect or representative democracy, census or restricted suffrage, universal male suffrage or of both sexes, different determinations of the age of majority, racial segregation, inclusion or not of immigrants, and others), as well as very different ways of altering or distorting it (borgo rotido, gerrymandering, electoral fraud, pucherazo).

• The existing relationship between the head of the State, the government and the parliament defines another classification, between presidentialisms and parliamentarisms (with many degrees or mixed forms between one and the other).

These three classifications are not exclusive, but complement each other, so that a republic can be democratic (United States or South Africa) or non-democratic (China or North Korea); a republican democracy can be parliamentary (Germany or India), semi-presidential (France or Russia) or presidential (Argentina or South Korea); and a monarchy can be democratic and parliamentary (Spain, United Kingdom or Japan), undemocratic (Saudi Arabia or Vatican City) or be placed in intermediate positions (Morocco), very usually qualified in a more or less anachronistic way with terms of the historical forms of the monarchy (feudal monarchy, authoritarian monarchy, absolute monarchy).

8 0
3 years ago
What was the potential consequences of the hartford convention?
Harlamova29_29 [7]

Answer

The Hartford Convention resulted in a declaration calling on the Federal Government to protect New England and to supply financial aid to New England's badly battered trade economy.

Explanation:

financial aid

6 0
3 years ago
What were the main reasons Germany forces aggressively expanded into neighboring countries in the late 1930s
k0ka [10]
Because they wanted to expend their territory
8 0
3 years ago
The committee charged with writing the declaration of independence
Mama L [17]

Answer:Congress appoints Committee of Five to draft the Declaration of Independence On June 11, 1776

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What were some important outcomes of the War of 1812?   A. Britain remained hopeful it would some day retake its former colonies
    5·2 answers
  • Why did Washington reject the advice of both Jefferson and Hamilton and adopt a policy of neutrality
    10·1 answer
  • Which court case is considered a victory for Mexican-Americans because it guaranteed them fair representation by a jury of their
    7·1 answer
  • Which technological advancement was developed in installations near these cities during World War 2?
    9·1 answer
  • Which was the last island that the Allies captured before preparing to attack mainland Japan?
    10·2 answers
  • Please please help me
    6·1 answer
  • With the arrival of the Industrial Revolution, machines became the main source of power for manufacturing and transportation. Th
    12·1 answer
  • What First Amendment right are the people in this photograph
    9·1 answer
  • Bicameral legislative=______ houses???
    7·1 answer
  • Compare and contrast asexual and sexual reproduction. Mention at least TWO similarities and THREE differences
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!