Answer: 40.7 years
Explanation:
You can use Excel to sold for this using the NPER function.
Rate = 10.2% / 12 months = 0.85%
Payment is $305 per month
Present value is $0
Future value is $2,200,000
Number of periods = 488.1979353
In years this is:
= 488.1979353 / 12
= 40.7 years
Answer:
The correct answer is d. The referral is court mandated.
Explanation:
When the main purpose of the call is to communicate information issued by a court, the person who should receive such communication must be the client directly, since their right to privacy must be respected, taking into account that for legal purposes it is important to maintain confidentiality. of the information. If there is the express will of the client to delegate a third person to receive the information, the conditions change because there is a consent that must be respected by the court.
Answer:
Ke = Rf + β(Rm - Rf)
Ke = 4.3 + 1.12(13.2 - 4.3)
Ke = 4.3 + 1.12(8.9)
Ke = 4.3 + 9.968
Ke = 14.268%
Explanation:
In this question, there is need to calculate cost of equity based on capital asset pricing model. Cost of equity is a function of risk-free rate plus beta multiplied by the difference between market return and risk free rate.
Answer:
The correct answer is E that is 18 eggs.
Explanation:
Assuming initially eggs be n which he bought
So, the price per dozen = $(12×12/n)
But finally, he bought (n + 2) eggs in the same price that is $12.
So, the new price per dozen = $(12×12/(n + 2))
Therefore,
12×12/n - 12×12/(n + 2) = 1
Taking 12 × 12 common from the above equation:
(12×12)[(n + 2) - n]/[n(n + 2)] = 1
144×2 = n(n + 2)
n(n + 2) = 288
n² +2n - 288 = 0
Now, we can either solve the above quadratic equation as follows,
n² + 2n - 288 = 0
n² + 18n - 16n - 288 = 0
(n + 18)(n - 16) = 0
As n would be positive because eggs cannot be in negative numbers therefore, n = 16
And he bought 2 extra, So
n = 16 + 2
n = 18 eggs
The eggs he bought is 18
Answer:
C. <u>flank</u>
Explanation:
A flank attack refers to an act by a product company whereby it attacks the weak links in the products of it's major competitor, particularly a leader.
In such scenarios, the company observes the limitations of the competitor's products and then embodies them in it's own new similar product. In a flank attack, the two companies deal in similar products which can be substituted for one another.
In the given case, Colgate came out with a similar product with improved aspect which it's major competitor's product overlooked i.e dental sensitivity aspect. This represents a case of flank attack.