A) Boycott british goods, because colonists believed that british tax laws were unfair because they lacked representation in parliament.
Answer: It had the most relevant information.
It provided many details about Chicago in the nineteenth century.
It provided reasons for Chicago’s growth in the nineteenth century.
It was well organized, which made it easy to find information.
It came from the most reputable author or website.
Explanation:
Allies managed to deliberate the whole Western Europe.
Explanation:
- After D-Day (June 6th, 1944) Allies started pushing Germans back.
- They started the attack on the shores on Normandy and started moving towards the south
- First they deliberated Paris and the whole France and then the countries of Benelux.
- In the meanwhile, Russians managed to break through from the east, and by the middle of 1945 the whole Europe was deliberated.
Learn more on World War 2 on
brainly.com/question/1698913
brainly.com/question/1298685
#learnwithBrainly
Answer:
Bleeding Kansas, Bloody Kansas or the Border War was a series of violent civil confrontations in the United States between 1854 and 1861 which emerged from a political and ideological debate over the legality of slavery in the proposed state of Kansas.
Result: Kansas admitted to the Union as a free ...
Location: Kansas and Missouri
Date: 1854–1861
Explanation:
Bleeding Kansas, Bloody Kansas or the Border War was a series of violent civil confrontations in the United States between 1854 and 1861 which emerged from a political and ideological debate over the legality of slavery in the proposed state of Kansas. The conflict was characterized by years of electoral fraud, raids, assaults, and retributive murders carried out in Kansas and neighboring Missouri by pro-slavery "Border Ruffians" and anti-slavery "Free-Staters".
At the core of the conflict was the question of whether the Kansas Territory would allow or outlaw slavery, and thus enter the Union as a slave state or a free state. The Kansas–Nebraska Act of 1854 called for popular sovereignty, requiring that the decision about slavery be made by the territory's settlers (rather than outsiders) and decided by a popular vote. Existing sectional tensions surrounding slavery quickly found focus in Kansas. Those in favor of slavery argued that every settler had the right to bring his own property, including slaves, into the territory. In contrast, while some "free soil" proponents opposed slavery on ethical and humanitarian grounds, at the time the most persuasive argument against introducing slavery in Kansas was that it would allow rich slaveholders to control the land, to the exclusion of white non-slaveholders who regardless of their moral inclinations did not have the means to acquire either slaves or sizable land holdings for themselves.
