B is the answer....Hope i helped! :)
Btw, i suggest watching Cleopatra with Elizabeth Taylor... It can help you understand your homework better!
Answer:
Macroeconomics deals with the economy as a whole and so deals with how variables such as government spending and interest rates will affect the entire economy not just single entities.
Microeconomics on the other hand, deals with individual entities in the economy and how various variables and decision making will affect them.
A nation prints more money, causing inflation. MACROECONOMICS.
This affects the entire nation not just single entities so it is macroeconomics.
A local store has a buy one, get one free sale. MICROECONOMICS.
This relates to the actions of a single entity in the economy so falls under microeconomics.
Oil production decreases, and gas prices rise nationwide. MACROECONOMICS.
As this concerns the entire nation, it is therefore under the realm of Macroeconomics.
Answer:
B.
Explanation:
Social Stratification can be defined as the society stratified based on caste, wealth, and class. This stratification leaves certain people devoid of benefits, limited access to resources, etc.
<u>The burial site found in southwest Asia by Archaeologists which differs in size, construction, and the number of objects found in each burial site reveals that the society was socially stratified. It is because in a socially stratified societies people tend to make burial sites differently for different groups</u>.
Thus, the correct answer is option B.
Answer:
c) critical thinking.
Explanation:
Critical thinking: The term critical thinking is defined as the tendency of an individual to make reasoned judgment that is being considered as well-though off and logical.
Critical thinking is defined as a way in which an individual thinks by not simply accepting every conclusions and arguments that he or she encountered yet carry an attitude of questioning the same.
In the question above, Melinda's concerns best illustrated critical thinking.
Answer: (A)
Dr. Pulaski is likely to find that approximately three-quarters (76 percent) of the subjects will conform to the group's judgment on at least one critical trial.
Explanation:
Solomon Asch conducted an experiment to find out to what extent people conform to group pressure.
He set up the experiment to include a single participant and seven confederates in a group. (A confederate is an accomplice of a researcher who is placed intentionally within an experiment by the researcher, so he can manipulate the experiment in his favor).
Each confederate was to give the same wrong answer to a certain question asked, while the participant was to provide his answer last.
Asch then observed if the single participant would tailor his answer according to the wrong answers provided by the confederates, or would provide the accurate answer.
Asch found out that from 12 trials conducted, "75% (three-quarters) of participants conformed to wrong answers provided at least once", while 25% did not conform at all.
He also discovered that on average of the trials carried out, one-third of the participants went along with the incorrect answer provided by the confederates.
Asch had also set up a control experiment with only a single participant and no confederates.
From the control experiment, he realized that less than 1% provided the wrong answer to the question asked.
