Answer: The situation is unconstitutional because it is defamation or libel
Explanation: The freedom of the press is guaranteed by the First Amendment of the American Constitution, which regulates all the rights and obligations of the media, including the press. This means that everyone has the right to freely report and write, and freely express their opinions without censorship. However, there are some limitations when it comes to press freedom. There are, among other things, the extent to which the journalist, i.e the writer of the article, can secure the protection of a confidential source, then also indecency. In this our case it is defamation which, when it comes to defamation in the press, calls libel. If Nancy wanted to make up a story about a politician she personally dislikes, then it is defamation. The First Amendment also does not guarantee the journalist the right to interfere personal feelings about the politician with professional writing in the newspaper. This means that if Nancy made up the story of a politician without real evidence of any wrongdoing, then it was defamation in the newspaper, therefore, libel.
Subject- Social Studies/History
Question- What did the apartheid government do to 3.5 million black South Africans between 1960 and 1986? How did this help the white minority gain, maintain, and consolidate power in apartheid South Africa?
Answer- Between 1960 and 1986, the apartheid government forcibly moved 3.5 million South Africans. The way that this helped the white minority gain, maintain, and consolidate power in apartheid South Africa was by, segregating the South Africans and created fewer opportunities for South Africans.
The answer to this question is socialization :)
Heifer International’s function is to help reduce poverty by providing support for small communities that want to grow but lack some of the essential resources.
The body of water south of Kuwait is The Persian Gulf
