Im sorry i dont know the answer choices
Once there lived a queen, she was a kind hearted person and wanted to see her subjects happy. Despite having few representatives of public, who told her about people's problems, some people were still unsatisfied. They once wrote a letter to the queen suggesting that public meetings should be hold at regular intervals in which decisions about subjects should be taken. The queen was really impressed by the suggestion and made a policy on the same. From then everyone was satisfied from the decisions.
<em>Note:You may want to change the bold words as follows:</em>
<em>Queen: Minister/Official</em>
<em>Subjects: </em><em>Citizens</em>
<h2>
Hope it helps!!</h2>
From my POV D is the answer
In Aldo Leopold’s ethics, actions can be distinguished through social approbation for right actions while social disapproval for wrong actions. This is in line with the mechanism of operation which is the same as any ethics. Social approbation is the society’s approval of one’s action. Since it is approved, it leads to the conclusion that a certain action is correct or right. However, during social disapproval, society doesn’t like the certain action or disapproves it leading to the conclusion that a certain actions showed is considered as inappropriate or wrong actions. These conclusions just coincide with the other ethics presented. Therefore society also play a big role in ethics.
The answer is option a, "<span>present an alternative proposal at the next council meeting".
</span><span>Because Luis is afraid that if the city council approves the proposal, his business will suffer. So he has no other option, if he has to present a proposal on next month council meeting by which his business will not suffer.</span>
