Answer:
At the beginning of the journey, Cabeza de Vaca's relationship was particularly negative especially with the Indian Apalachee tribe. This Indian group was mostly described as being a violent and savage group. Even Europeans have had to ‘defend themselves’ against this tribe. Cabeza de Vaca described attacks on them in a positive tone, as if he supports it.
However, Cabeza de Vaca describes attacks on other Indian groups, in a less negative tone. This clearly shows that his relationship with other Indian groups was more positive. He even described some of them as helpful and skilled people. <em>His relationship with the Pimas and Opatas people is the most positive.</em><em> </em>
At the end of the Naufragios (Journey), Cabeza de Vaca described himself as the one that pleads for peaceful conversion of the Pimas and Opatas. He even opposes the aggressive stance of fellow Christians who wanted to enslave these Indians.
In all, this help us know that Cabeza de Vaca developed an emphatic view of the indigenous people, this obviously ‘transformed’ him from a conquistador to a missionary who protects the Indians.
It's the second one because of the facts presented in the text
Answer:
There are three types of third person, limited, omniscient, and objective. the difference between these types of third persons, is that limited a narrator reports the facts and interprets events from the perspective of a single character. omniscient is an all-knowing narrator not only reports the facts but may also interpret events and relate the thoughts and feelings of any character. last but not least objective is the facts of a narrative are reported by a seemingly neutral, impersonal observer or recorder.
Explanation:
<em>Question:</em>
<h2>
hElPpP mEeH pLeAsEe TvT (picture)</h2><h2 />
<u><em>Answer:</em></u>
<h3>The answer should be <u>Several studies have found that children who attend preschool experience long-term benefits, including an increased likelihood of graduating high school.</u></h3>
Why?
<h3>Well, this answer is a reasonable claim that supports the subject (Government-funded preschool programs are a wise use of taxpayer dollars).</h3><h3 />
* <em>I am not responsible if you get this question wrong, for you are the one who asked the question. *</em>
<h3>⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯⎯</h3>
<u>If this helped, your welcome! Please know that I might be wrong, and if I am, I am truly sorry for that. But If you would, please make me brainliest.</u>
I hope you have a great rest of your day! If there is an issue with this question, be happy to comment. <3
<em><u>-niaxfandoms (insta and yt)</u></em>
Answer:
im really not sure but probably true
Explanation:
you could say "the main Idea is about football" or have an entire paragraph talking about football. both having focus around football. make sense? srry if this doesnt help
