Answer:
1. d) There was a lack of evidence that the students ' actions disrupted learning.
2. c) Students have fewer privacy rights in school than in other public settings.
3. d) Brianna's 1st Amendment rights (freedom of speech) were violated, and her actions did not cause any disruptions to the day-to-day functioning of the school.
4. c) New Jersey v. T.L.O.
5. a) Bell's recording provided grounds for a substantial disruption and interference with normal school activities.
Explanation:
- The court ruled that the school administration's search of T.L.O.'s pocketbook in this instance did not violate the 4th Amendment. The fourth amendment applies to everyone in the school, including the administrators.
- On June 25, 2009, the Supreme Court upheld, reversed, and remanded. In a judgement made by the court in the 4th amendment case of New Jersey v. T. L. O., the Court decided that the search did not meet the "reasonable suspicion" requirement for searches of kids in a school context.
- Due to the policy's vagueness and potential for discriminatory application, the court found it illegal. The court also said that Brianna's 1st Amendment rights had been violated because her actions didn't change how the school normally ran.
Because Colonists should help pay for the costs of the french and Indian war
<span>novanet answer=to pay war debts and keep the colonies safe</span>
Hello there!
Mudslings is making malicious or scandalous allegations about an opponent with the aim of damaging their reputation. To defend theirselves, each candidate talk only about his own accomplishments and ideas; it allows to people to know more about their believes and thoughts.
Correct answer is B: Where the candidates stand on the issues
Hope this helps.
