I have not read the excerpt myself, but I can give you some tips on detecting the correct conflict. To detect whether conflict is internal or external, consider the way the story is told. If the conflict is interior, it will take place within the mind of a character. If the conflict is external, it will take place physically or verbally between two characters or between a character and some exterior force, such as nature. To figure out who the conflict is taking place between, consider whether the character in question is battling their own mind, feelings, or actions; this would indicate that they are in conflict with themselves. If the subject of their conflict is another character, that would indicate that they are not in conflict with themselves. Hope this helps.
The irony lies in the fact that the summoner was a corrupt man and that he acted only on his behalf.
We can arrive at this answer because:
- The summoner acted like a Christian and honorable man, but was extremely corrupt.
- He permitted any wrongdoing as long as he got a bottle of wine in return.
- In this case, the summoner allows the forgiveness of people's sins, if they can please him with something.
In this case, the narrator shows that the image of a corrupt summoner is ironic, but more common than it sounds.
More information:
brainly.com/question/11515632?referrer=searchResults
Well, yeah. The Hunger Games are put to an end and Snow dies. She lives the rest of her life peacefully so I'd say her plan was successful
Is this an English question ?<span />
