The 4th Amendment states that people shall not be subject to unreasonable searches and seizures, and no unreasonable warrants shall be issued for unreasonable searches and seizures without a good reason.
The 5th Amendment states that everyone has a right to a trial by jury, and that nobody shall be tried for the same crime more than once. It also prevents people from being forced to provide evidence that could be used to incriminate their own self. Finally, people's property or life or freedom cannot be taken away without due process of law, and private property that has been seized for public use will warrant just compensation.
The 6th Amendment states that every person has a right to a speedy and public trial, as well as the right to be confronted with the witnesses against their self, a right to an attorney in their case, and a right to know the charges they are being tried for.
I highlighted the important parts.
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "<span>C. Many available laborers ." The </span>characteristic that was not a reason that the industrial revolution began in England is that <span>Many available laborers.</span>
The answer to your question is,
e. allow American companies and banks to invest in foreign countries
-Mabel <3
Answer:
A. The Warren Court believed that segregation did in fact stamp
African Americans with a badge of inferiority
Explanation:
According to the excerpt from the U.S. Supreme Court, Plessy v. Ferguson, 1896, the court rules that segregation gave African Americas a sense of inferiority.
The statement that explains why the Warren Court eventually overturned the ruling above is that the Warren Court believed that segregation did in fact stamp African Americans with a badge of inferiority.
Answer And Explanation: <u><em>No taxation without representation" is a slogan originating during the 1700s that summarized one of 27 colonial grievances of the American colonists in the Thirteen Colonies, which was one of the major causes of the American Revolution. In short, many in those colonies believed that, as they were not directly represented in the distant British Parliament, any laws it passed affecting the colonists (such as the Sugar Act and the Stamp Act) were illegal under the Bill of Rights 1689, and were a denial of their rights as Englishmen.</em></u>
<u><em></em></u>
<u><em></em></u>
<u><em>HOPE THIS HELPS PLS MARK BRAINLIEST</em></u>
