Answer:
Gun rights vs. Gun control.
Explanation:
Overwhelming majorities of Republicans and Republican-leaning independents and Democrats and Democratic leaners (89% each) say mentally ill people should be barred from buying guns. Nearly as many in both parties (86% of Democrats, 83% of Republicans) favor barring gun purchases by people on federal watch lists. And sizable majorities also favor making private gun sales and sales at gun shows subject to background checks (91% of Democrats, 79% of Republicans).
Yet there is a 30-percentage-point difference between Democrats and Republicans in support for an assault weapons ban (81% of Democrats, 50% of Republicans) and even wider gaps on two other proposals: arming teachers and school officials in elementary and high schools and allowing people to carry concealed weapons in more places.
Defense is responsible for proving a person’s innocence
Brainliest?
Answer:
Both houses must accept the bill
Explanation:
Before a bill can be passed on to the president to either veto or pass, it must first be approved by both the House and the Senate. The houses generally hash out their differences, rewrite the bill, and provide the final draft to the president who can then either veto the bill or pass it. There are also other ways in which a bill can be passed if the president vetoes it. For example, the chamber that originated the legislation can attempt to override the veto by a vote of two-thirds of those present.
Answer:
<em>Here </em><em>is </em><em>my </em><em>answer </em><em>for </em><em>ur </em><em>question</em>
<em>Police </em><em>writing</em><em> </em><em>is </em><em>important </em><em>for </em><em>a </em><em>number </em><em>of </em><em>reasons</em><em> </em><em>bcauz </em><em>of </em><em>the </em><em>immense </em><em>number </em><em>of </em><em>suspects </em><em>that </em><em>the </em><em>police </em><em>officers</em><em> </em><em>deal </em><em>with </em><em>on </em><em>a </em><em>daily</em><em> </em><em>basis </em><em>so </em><em>there</em><em>f</em><em>ore </em><em>it </em><em>is </em><em>virtually</em><em> </em><em>that </em><em>is </em><em>very </em><em>impossible</em><em> </em><em>for </em><em>any </em><em>police </em><em>to </em><em>remember </em><em>every </em><em>detail</em><em> </em><em>with </em><em>the </em><em>case </em><em>without</em><em> </em><em>making</em><em> </em><em>any </em><em>notes </em>
<em><u>I </u></em><em><u>think</u></em><em><u> </u></em><em><u>this </u></em><em><u>might </u></em><em><u>help </u></em><em><u>ur </u></em><em><u>question</u></em>
Answer:
This is a difficult situation. If a juror would see the defendant crying it could impose that they are sorry for what they did if they were guilty. Dressing appropriately can show you're not a bum and do have dignity. Acting appropriately can impose you are mature.
