1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Tju [1.3M]
3 years ago
15

Why might the description of Virginia written by the Virginia company be different from the accounts written by John Smith and R

ichard Frethorne?
History
1 answer:
avanturin [10]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Because the company promoted a biased description of virgins by establishing only the good points about it, while Smith and Frethorne's accounts were more realistic and impartial.

Explanation:

The company promoted a description where it only addressed the qualities of Vírginia. This was done to help settlers and show the state as a wonderful and flawless earth. In fact, Vírginia had advantages, but the description of the company was completely biased and incomplete in many factors. John Smith and Richard Frethorne, on the other hand, presented more complete reports, as they were indeed familiar with the territory. They presented a more impartial report, describing the state as it really was, without alleviating possible defects.

You might be interested in
What way did FDR increased citizen participation in government?
Nimfa-mama [501]
By creating government jobs like the Tennessee Valley Authority.
5 0
3 years ago
What was not a feature of welfare reform
forsale [732]
Not a bypass of recession
8 0
3 years ago
Where did the United States hope to expand to the in 1840’s
lisabon 2012 [21]
TO THE PACIFIC, NOT 100% SURE THO
6 0
4 years ago
Grade 8 language arts segment 2 exam answers flvs
steposvetlana [31]

Answer:

this makes no sense

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In debating the origins of knowledge, Plato and Aristotle disagreed about the relative importance of what?
Andreyy89

Plato and Aristotle disagreed about the relative importance of Nature and Nurture.

<em>Plato</em> introduced the term nativism (<em>Nature</em>) as the idea that our thoughts, ideas and characteristics are inborn. In other words, we are believed to be born with these thoughts, ideas and characteristics, and that they are already in our genes.

On other hand, Aristotle introduced the idea to us of empiricism, or <em>Nurture</em>. He described this as, knowledge is gained through experience (senses). Our thoughts and ways are not because of our genetic make-up, but because of how we were raised and brought up by our parents and overall lifestyle.  

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • What is one main characteristic of secondary sources intended for academics and students?
    15·2 answers
  • Under the Eighth Amendment, a person charged with a crime
    15·2 answers
  • How can a strong ruler or government bring order to a society​
    13·2 answers
  • How had the Civil War affected life in Louisiana by the end of the conflict? Check all that apply.
    6·1 answer
  • Was President Roosevelt justified in ordering Executive Order 9066, which resulted in the internment of Japanese American citize
    14·1 answer
  • Explain the European justification for the partitioning of Africa.
    10·1 answer
  • Summarize the relationship between the boers and the British in South Africa.
    9·1 answer
  • What does it mean Bermuda triangle and where did it located ????​
    12·1 answer
  • Does the decision made by Harry Truman justifies his reasons for coming up such decision?<br>​
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a counter claim to a decision made by the Supreme Court?
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!