1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Tju [1.3M]
3 years ago
15

Why might the description of Virginia written by the Virginia company be different from the accounts written by John Smith and R

ichard Frethorne?
History
1 answer:
avanturin [10]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

Because the company promoted a biased description of virgins by establishing only the good points about it, while Smith and Frethorne's accounts were more realistic and impartial.

Explanation:

The company promoted a description where it only addressed the qualities of Vírginia. This was done to help settlers and show the state as a wonderful and flawless earth. In fact, Vírginia had advantages, but the description of the company was completely biased and incomplete in many factors. John Smith and Richard Frethorne, on the other hand, presented more complete reports, as they were indeed familiar with the territory. They presented a more impartial report, describing the state as it really was, without alleviating possible defects.

You might be interested in
Who is Peter Parker?
SpyIntel [72]

Answer:

Peter Parker is spiderman Peter gained his powers after being bitten by a radioactive spider at the age of fifteen

Explanation:

7 0
3 years ago
How did the U.S. government protect the Pentagon in 1967?
UNO [17]
I think its C. they staged a counter-demonstration. I may be wrong. 

8 0
3 years ago
Who was the first US president
mylen [45]

The first president of the United States was George Washington who served from 1789 to 1797.


Hope this helps!

5 0
3 years ago
how did america beat britain in the american revolution? what were the advantages for the colonists? PLEASE HELP ME!!!
Finger [1]
Colonists knew the land, and used suprised tactics much like the Vietcong in Vietnam. Colonists were also fighting for their freedom, while British soldiers were fighting because it was their job. British soldiers also had to travel across the sea to be deployed, whereas colonists didn’t have to move.
4 0
3 years ago
PLease help!!
Anastaziya [24]
Challenges:
surviving adulthood (lack of modern medicine, plagues, violence of medieval times) And everything was expensive so many faced debt even though they were nobles. (War was also an issue during those times)
Benefits:
They lived more structured lives, enjoyed more wealth, had greater availability to weapons and armor, medicines and they could employ fighters. They also had better clothes, food, power and did not have to preform hard labor!
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did “dynamic conservatism” affect the U.S. political landscape?
    9·1 answer
  • 2. How did the Paris peace conference affect Arabs?
    6·2 answers
  • Why did Congress resist President Ford’s 1974 Whip Inflation Now (WIN) campaign? Stagflation was no longer a problem in the Unit
    6·2 answers
  • Why was the spoils system created? Jackson wanted to employ well-qualified advisors based on merit. Jackson felt it was necessar
    15·1 answer
  • What is NOT true of the 1973 oil embargo? Question 22 options:
    13·1 answer
  • What does lincoln mean by calling the civil war a test of the nation's ability to"long endure?"
    11·2 answers
  • What part do the states play in the amendment process?​
    15·1 answer
  • Missouri compromise how did it address selavery
    13·1 answer
  • Giving brainliest!
    10·1 answer
  • Drag the tiles to the correct boxes to complete the pairs match the terms with their meanings 1. dharma 2. ahimsa 3. karma
    10·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!