The correct answer is False
Explanation:
Primary sources always reflect the perspective of those who lived or witnessed a specific event; for example, letters written by a soldier in combat about the first world war are considered as a primary source. Therefore, a primary source is a first-hand account, not an interpreted source.
On the other hand, secondary and tertiary sources are those created by others using primary sources or secondary sources, this means they show the interpretation of others, and due to this, information might be inaccurate. This implies secondary and tertiary sources are those that had been interpreted, and therefore the statement is false because primary sources had not been interpreted; also, these are preferred by researches due to this reason.
Fire, blankets, shelter etc
The question wants to analyze your reading and writing skills and for that reason, I cannot write the article for you, but I will show you how to write it.
An op-ed piece is an article that shows your opinion on a particular topic. For this, you must reflect on the subject of morality versus science and create your opinion about it.
This opinion must be justified by evidence, which must be found in articles that analyze and deal with this subject in a coherent and reliable way. You should research and read these articles.
After that, you can create your opinion.
<h3>Steps to create an essay</h3>
- Introduction: Introduce the subject that will be addressed in the essay and show your opinion on the subject.
- Body: Write at least two paragraphs. In the first paragraph, you will show evidence that proves your opinion and makes it stronger and more credible. In the second paragraph, you will associate your opinion with the book "Frankenstein" and show how this subject is approached in that book.
- Conclusion: Summarize all the information presented, reinforce your opinion and show how important this debate is for society.
More information on how to write an essay is at the link:
brainly.com/question/683722
Answer: I believe it is this argument appeals to the wheelchair ethos of the wealthy upper middle class American slob
Explanation:
Answer:
I wake up to the smell of cookies
Walking downstairs, I see my parents bake
They smile at me and tell me to eat.
My brother runs down the stairs
And asks what they're making.
They reply cookies, and he sits.
So it's just the three of us
Sitting together, a family
Smiles, laughter, and cookies.
Explanation:
Is this good?
